sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Peter Dunne says the Government will be worried that soon public concern about the social and economic impact of Covid19 - already sharply on the rise - will overtake support for the approach the Government has taken so far

Peter Dunne says the Government will be worried that soon public concern about the social and economic impact of Covid19 - already sharply on the rise - will overtake support for the approach the Government has taken so far

By Peter Dunne*

Recent public opinion polls are revealing some very interesting, if somewhat contradictory, insights into New Zealanders’ current thinking about the Covid19 crisis and the national response.

The most recent 1News Colmar Brunton poll reported that 92% of those surveyed considered that the government “had responded appropriately to the coronavirus outbreak” – up from 62% when the same question had been asked in February. To a second question, 86% rated the “government’s response to the economic impacts of the coronavirus outbreak” as good or better.

Yet, at virtually the same time, the Commission for Financial Capability was reporting its own survey data showing that already one in ten households had missed a mortgage or rent payment because of the Covid19 emergency, and that 34% of households had already experienced some financial difficulty, and a further nearly 40% felt on the brink of doing so.

A similar recent survey by Research New Zealand reported that 75% of respondents were concerned about the impact the crisis was having on their children. That survey also reported that there have been significant increases in the level of concern about losing one’s job (67%), being able to pay the mortgage (59%) and being able to pay the rent (61%).

So, while at a more global level, New Zealanders are happy with the way the government has responded to date, they are becoming increasingly concerned about the longer terms impacts on their families, the future of their jobs, and their capacity to meet their weekly outgoings.

And evidence is mounting every day of the serious impact on employment and business – this week alone has seen Air New Zealand confirm 1,300 job losses, the Millennium and Copthorne Hotels chain say over 900 of its jobs are at risk, and the long-established southern department store H&J Smith foreshadow around 175 potential job losses as it looks to downsize to survive. Taxi company Green Cabs has gone into liquidation, costing 160 jobs.

As more small to medium sized businesses resume after the lockdowns, the more likely it is that these numbers will escalate considerably as the stark reality of how difficult business and trading conditions are going to become hits home. Moreover, for the first time since probably the 1930s Depression the job losses and business failures will start to hit those who have never previously had reason to even consider such a possibility would affect them.

Treasury estimates that unemployment will peak at 9.8% by September this year, and start to fall back after that have been dismissed as “wildly optimistic” by analysts such as Infometrics, with most other commentators predicting unemployment to rise to well above 10% by September and fall only slowly after that.

Already, the numbers on the Jobseeker benefit have risen around 27% to just over 184,000 in just five weeks between the move to Alert Level 4 from late March and the beginning of May. The government’s announcement this week of a new temporary tax-free payment to help those who have lost their jobs because of Covid19 confirms its recognition of the severity of the situation we are now facing.

The worry for the government now must be that at some point not too far away the two apparently contradictory strands of public opinion will crossover. Public concern about the social and economic impact of Covid19, already sharply on the rise, will overtake support for the approach the government has taken so far.

Throw in a general election in just over three months and it becomes especially challenging. Already the Greens and New Zealand First – the government’s support partners, both polling below the 5% threshold in the most recent Colmar Brunton poll – are starting to actively distance themselves from the Labour Party, just in case.

The Greens have been critical of this week’s emergency relief package as introducing a two tier welfare system, too narrowly focused on what they describe as the middle classes, while New Zealand First has taken more direct aim at the Prime Minister claiming somewhat incongruously that she agrees with them that the country is taking too long to move to Alert Level 1. Neither of these reactions is about policy – both are much more about struggling smaller parties sensing that public disgruntlement will rise and stellar support for the government fall as more and more households and businesses are directly impacted. Quite understandably, they want to be on the right side of public opinion when the crossover occurs. 

Labour’s response has to be built around the ever-increasing stature of the Prime Minister, as it hopes to be able to keep enough wind in its sails to hold an increasingly fracturing government on course in the lead-up to the election and maintain the momentum it has established so far. It cannot afford to be sidetracked by crew members scrapping openly on the foredeck about which sails to hoist for the run home, while the previously wallowing National Party has started to look for more favourable airs.

The uncertainty of this and the contradictions in public opinion, and where they might all head, have added even more to the fascination of what is already shaping up as New Zealand’s most dramatic and unusual election ever.    


*Peter Dunne is the former leader of UnitedFuture, an ex-Labour Party MP, and a former cabinet minister. This article first ran here and is used with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

321 Comments

Severe lack of a sense of humour at times in here :-)

Up
0

Peter, have you ever looked to see how your grandparents got through the Great Depression of the 1930s?.

I have already noted in these columns how my father's father dealt with it, and as for my mother's father he lost his radio shop (probably the first such shop in the Waikato) in Hamilton. No dole those days, only a little charity, soup kichens,etc.
So he took his family up to Auckland where he rented the house at 4 Cromwell St Mt Eden, the very house which I believe Helen Clark owns today; there he got the landlords permission to convert into two flats so they could live in one and sublet the other. He then got a job as a piano polisher at Atwater's piano shop and sold insurance in the evenings. My grandmother developed a large vegetable garden. After the Depression he picked himself up and opened first a milk bar in Huntly and then a larger lady's dress shop/drapery and later prospered as Huntly actually became a boom town from the end of WW2 to the 1960s.
I don't believe most people have the resourcefulness to deal with depressions in this day and age. We have been spoon-fed on welfare and don't know anything else. I do believe in welfare to a certain extent.....I wouldn't want people to starve or not have shelter, but I do believe, for instance people who run small businesses should have built up reserve 'savings for a rainy day'.......remember that saying.....you don't hear it so much today.

Up
0

because today you are at a disadvantage if you have cash, or if you leave cash in a business. it is best practice now to use debt, and lease
the shop owners that will come out of this will be the old timer whom owns his workshop/shop and has no debt, he may have to let staff go but he will be able to rebound

Up
0

Yes, I well remember my grandparents stories from the Great Depression. They got married in 1929 and raised 8 kids. Lost everything twice to fire, and started again. They knew all about hardship and living frugally and were in reasonable financial shape by the early 70's but then inflation took its toll on savings.
They were dead against debt and chided me when I bought my first car on HP at some enormous interest rate.
When my employer went broke 6 months later I had to sell the car to clear the debt. Lesson learned.

Up
0

Debt in business is still a risk and weight on the health of the business in any downturn.

It might be inefficient (well, it is) to over capitalise, but at least it increases the chances of making it out the other side of shutdowns.

Up
0

@ Ralph,I bet there is a few businesses happy they have been running a 'lazy' balance sheet right now.

Up
0

Yep, for sure. But it is highly likely those same businesses would not exist without having taken on significant debt in their early days. Length in business is a key predictor of low gearing, most in that category will admit it is as much that they got lucky on timing as having made conscious decisions to not borrow to the hilt.

Up
0

Luck?I thought all businesses were run by clever entrepreneurial types.

Up
0

Some for sure.

But justas sure are others who never borrowed and had to wait for the business to grow.

Up
0

My grandfather left school at 14 when his father died and joined the Colonial Motor Company in Wellington to sweep floors. He was an only son and had to support both himself and his mother and put himself through night school at the same time.

Up
0

Had a shock today - found after a little thought that I agreed with Phil Goff! We do need to bring in foreign students. They may present a Covid risk in big cities such as Auckland and Wellington but we do have universities in smaller places where contract tracing would be simpler.
Not those students who used to come here to pick fruit, attend dummy study courses and rort residency. No there really is a brainy elite who God distributes evenly into all countries. They always gravitated to Oxford, MIT, Harvard, Stanford and have helped create Silicon Glen and Silicon Fen. Obviously they will prefer mask free NZ to California, NY, London, etc. Only problem I can see is they will eat our middle ranked professors for breakfast. So step one is sack most of our academics and replace them with world leaders in STEM subjects.
Honestly isn't that a better idea than giving priority to Avatar film production staff?

Up
0

I have no problem with this either as long as the process of bringing them in is secure and paid for by the student and university.
how hard can it be for them to be tested day before boarding the plane, temp check and medical look over at the departure gate. and when they get here transferred to a dorm that is secure and only contains people under quarantine for 14 days then tested on day of release.
also why is the government not working with a couple of hotels to set up quarantine facilities for others that want to come and that will pay for it

Up
0

also why is the government not working with a couple of hotels to set up quarantine facilities for others that want to come and that will pay for it

How do you know they aren't?

Up
0

Well, decisions have consequences - and the economic consequences are starting to show themselves

The other major concern around the lock down are the breaches of civil rights, even under a 'state of emergency' it was incredibly easy for the government to shut the country down, remove freedoms and directly contradict the bill of rights act
i.e.
The list below is directly copied from the bill of rights act 1990
NZer's have the rights to:
16 Freedom of peaceful assembly
17 Freedom of association
18 Freedom of movement
(1) Everyone lawfully in New Zealand has the right to freedom of movement and residence in New Zealand.
(2) Every New Zealand citizen has the right to enter New Zealand.
(3) Everyone has the right to leave New Zealand.
(4) No one who is not a New Zealand citizen and who is lawfully in New Zealand shall be required to leave New Zealand except under a decision taken on grounds prescribed by law.
19 Freedom from discrimination
22 Liberty of the person
Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily arrested or detained.

This was clearly overridden by the health ministers directives, with the act taken to the widest possible extent but should this be allowed?
It concerns me that laws and freedoms can be effectively removed for a period so easily

Up
0

I think that's why they rushed through the COVID bill, because once there is no actual epidemic (no cases in fact) there is no legal leg to stand on health wise.

So the COVID bill locks us into a sort of state of emergency without any emergency for long periods of time.

Up
0

100%, and in the meantime the bill of rights act gets trodden all over in 90 day rolling periods for the sake of a risk that is near non-existent

And "worst case scenario" you are very unfortunate and do catch COVID 19, the majority of people (i.e. 99.9% of

Up
0

This was clearly overridden by the health ministers directives, with the act taken to the widest possible extent but should this be allowed?

Yes, it should be allowed.

The question that is more interesting is should it have been done in this case. Overseas evidence suggests the answer to that is also "yes".

Up
0

That is an opinion and also highly debatable

Up
0

To paraphrase Crocodile Dundee's "you call that a knife.."comment.
You call this a lockdown...try Wuhans,with apartments padlocked from the outside, with hazmat suited officials spraying god knows what chemicals in the street,police beating on people not wearing masks.Most of us were baking & watching netflix...

Up
0

Never claimed otherwise.

Up
0

Holy smokes - page two of comments. New territory for me.

Up
0