sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Bernard Hickey says the Commerce Commission and the Govt need to help the RBNZ and consumers by cracking down harder on the monopolies and taxes that drive endemic inflation

Bernard Hickey says the Commerce Commission and the Govt need to help the RBNZ and consumers by cracking down harder on the monopolies and taxes that drive endemic inflation
Do we need tougher rules for monopoly pricing and Government fee levels? Endemic non-tradable inflation levels suggest so, says Bernard Hickey

By Bernard Hickey

Market power is a thing to behold, as is the power of governments to tax and charge.

This power allows companies and governments to raise prices, profits and taxes much faster than in the rest of the economy.

This inflation creates super profits, drags on productivity growth and forces interest rates higher than they otherwise would need to be.

Ultimately, these monopolies and tax increases act like a handbrake on economic growth and consumer purchasing power.

New Zealand is rife with these concentrations of market power, both in the free market and in state owned businesses.

The simplest way to measure just how much this has cost is to look at non-tradable inflation.

This measures the inflation generated by those parts of the economy that don't have to compete with the rest of the world.

This tradable sector includes banking, insurance, electricity, building materials, education, real estate and health industries. These services sectors make up over 70% of our economy.

Over the last decade non-tradable inflation averaged 3.4% per year, while tradable inflation averaged 1.3%.

This inflation expresses itself in much higher power prices, insurance premiums, banking profits, real estate commissions, house building costs and professional services fees.

The Productivity Commission has investigated the services sector to find out why it's failing to keep prices under control. New Zealand is a laggard in the OECD in productivity, being second from bottom in the Commission's comparisons and generating less than half of the productivity growth seen in the likes of Britain, the United States and even Greece.

The Commission pointed out these sectors are often less competitive and it called on the Government to reform the "unconventional, complex and imprecise" laws about the use of market power, which are in section 36 of the Commerce Act.

The Commerce Commission, which has to prosecute abuses of market power, has also called for reform of Section 36.

Their are plenty of live examples of industries where companies with dominant market positions and comfortable relationships with each other have elevated prices.

The Commerce Commission is prosecuting Carter Holt Harvey over price fixing in the Auckland timber market after giving Fletcher Building immunity because it is cooperating.

The Commission is also investigating Fletcher Building's supply arrangements for plasterboard with building supplies merchants, which of course include Fletcher's own Placemakers and Carter Holt's Carters chain. Fletcher says its Winstone Wallboards has a 94% share of the market.

The noise is also building around IAG's takeover of Lumley. IAG already owns AMI, State and NZI, so buying Lumley would increase its share of the home, contents and vehicle insurance market to 66% from 60%.

The Commission is investigating and may force IAG to sell off some assets.

Tower's Chairman Michael Stiassny has rightly warned about the concentration risks and Green co-leader Russel Norman has also called on the Government to ensure a more competitive insurance market. Norman too has called for reform of Section 36.

The Commission will no doubt peruse Statistics NZ's figures showing premiums have risen 45% over the last 10 years, almost twice the inflation rate for the Consumer Price Index.

Interestingly, insurance premiums rose only slightly faster than the non-tradable sector's price inflation of 40.9% over the last decade.

This week's stoush in the market for real estate advertising emphasises just how New Zealand businesses operate. The ideal from a business point of view is to create a cosy relationship between companies that allows consumers to be over-charged.

Five real estate agency franchisors have settled into a comfortable relationship with the two publishing groups, APN and Fairfax, that means vendors are now over-paying for the display advertising published in the likes of the Property Press and property supplements.

Only the arrival of the new technology of internet listings and the intervention of another near-monopoly, Trade Me, is challenging the over-pricing.

Trade Me has already killed off the monopoly pricing of the two newspaper groups in classified advertising. It is now attacking the lucrative market for glossy, colour display ads for houses. Overseas, home sellers now typically spend over 70% of their ad budgets online and the rest in print, whereas in New Zealand that split is still the reverse at 70% on print ads and 30% online.

Trade Me is using its natural network monopoly market power in internet listings to quadruple prices for the agency offices in an effort to accelerate the reversal of that split in New Zealand.

Ultimately, though, Trade Me should face the same anti-monopoly scrutiny once the technology-driven switch is complete.

But the worst of the inflation is coming out of Government, both central and local.

Rates have risen 74.6% over the last decade and the broader category of central government fees and charges has risen 53.5%.

Household energy costs, which are created mostly by the state-owned power generators and lines companies, have risen 66% over the last decade.

It's a pity neither the Commerce Commission nor the Productivity Commission are able to investigate or prosecute governments, which dominate the services sector.

Sadly, the Productivity Commission's report into the services sector was precluded from looking at the electricity sector or the Governments themselves.

This is where politicians and voters need to step up and help the Reserve Bank and themselves by bearing down on these prices and taxes, and striving for higher productivity. One of the least noted sections of the Reserve Bank's December Quarter Monetary Policy Statement was that increased petrol and tobacco taxes are expected to increase the Consumer Price Index by 0.3% for each of the next three years.

There is some hope that new technology and the advent of cloud computing could do for services sector competition what years of weak regulation and poorly designed legislation has not.

The Productivity Commission also called for Government to make it much easier for service industries to use cloud computing. We're seeing a sneak preview of this in small business accounting where Xero was nimble and connected enough to get Government dispensation for hosting New Zealand tax records in the cloud on servers offshore.

There is ample opportunity for medical services, financial services and education to migrate into the cloud.

A lot more needs to be done because monetary policy needs mates. The current Government has brayed loudly about how it thinks a big-spending Labour/Green Government would force a monetary policy reaction higher in interest rates.

But governments of all colours could and should do a lot more to increase their own and the private sector's competitive intensity, along with keeping fees and rates inflation to a minimum.

Anything less would be to allow a nation of monopolies to keep building and running their own troughs that bog the economy in the mud of inflation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A version of this article was first published in the Herald on Sunday. It is used here with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

36 Comments

You nailed it Bernard.  This is a top issue in our country and for our future.

Time the National Party woke up.  Given that most of their members are middle class, how is it that they don't understand that the monoply system it supports is screwing them as well. Mind you Labour won,t do better.  They don't see any big picture either and their only fight is over the scraps.

We seem to have a two tier system.  Free market and tough for individuals and small business. Cosy arrangements and huge extortionate profits for the monopolists you describe.

New Zealanders and their political parties are very naive on this one.  But what we need is some serious trustbusting.  A total reform of the economy around this aspect.  And New Zealand run in the interests of New Zealanders.  No more being farmed.

 

Up
0

+1 Bernard you are a brave man. Well done.

Up
0

I would have to say that this is one of BH's better articles. That's a compliment BH....and I don't hand them out very often.

 

Up
0

BUT BH your headline states

"Bernard Hickey says the Commerce Commission and the Govt need to help the RBNZ and consumers by cracking down harder on the monopolies and taxes that drive endemic inflation"

This is sort of right and sort of wrong. Monopolies and Govt are driving inflation - agree. However is the RBNZ a Saint in all this?

No doubt I will kicked off this site for saying this but isn't the RBNZ part of the problem when it owns shares in certain Companies that you mention within your article.

 

To Mr Ed - turning a blind eye to facts is not good journalism so kick me off if you want but you know and I both know that the RBNZ holds shares in one of the monopolies BH discusses in his article.  Why would you want to cover the truth? In my view the RBNZ holding these shares adds nothing to financial stability and a regulator should not have any pecuniary interest.

 

Up
0

Ironic that one monopoly (newspaper advertising) is replaced by another (trade me. There's little gain in that for the consumer. Air NZ regional services is another monopoly that springs to mind. I think one of main factors restricting competition in NZ is the cost/benefit of setting up business in country with such a small sporadic population, particularly those with heavy infrastructure and capital expenditure requirements. In this category are airlines, mobile phone,supermarkets,electricity etc.

Up
0

The problem with AirNZ regional is they dont even have to compete with road and rail, they can over charge and still be the cheapest.

The goverment could set up a supermarket and then sell off 49% on the NZX to get there money back.

Up
0

Rates have gone up much more than your figures show. My accountants have a small office in Nelson in an older building that has not changed in the last ten years except for repairs to roof leaks and a coat of paint.

Rates 2004/05       $  7685

Rates 2012/13       $18925

This is what a disfunctional system really looks like. Costs are loaded onto the small business sector by the back door.

 

Is it any wonder that we have become a country where our major investment is in competing with each other to borrow more money to outbid each other for leaky, damp, mouldy houses?

Up
0

Roger you are so right what do we we get for our rates that go up in excess of inflation ?

 ..... nothing.

 

Amost every traditional council function is now outsourced and we pay a User-pays charge  , yet the rates have increased in excess of inflatrion

  • Water now billed sepreately
  • Wastewater billed seperately
  • Refuse removal outsourced and billed seperately
  • Building plan approval is a profit centre and a rort
  • Subdivision and DC Charges are a profit centre 
  • Numerous Council services previusoly billed for thru rates and now charged individually

 

 

Up
0

If the TPPA goes through the government will have no hope of reigning in any of this monopolistic profiteering.  Overseas corporations will be able to sue the NZ government for harming their corporate profotability.

Up
0

Every now and then you write an absolute pealer Bernard... this was one. 

Up
0

And the Duopoly of retail food in NZ by Foodstuffs and Progressive is another example. They charge what they like, NZers are compliant, dont complain. And tthere are no alternatiives other than BinnInn & Farmers mkts etc.

Up
0

Grocery costs are the top or 2nd annual cost for households. E.g. $250 pw = $12,500 pa. Only mortgage costs for younger / Auckland families would be greater.

Up
0

.... our hearts bleed for you Mr Zz .... we've instructed the NZ Red Cross to drop emergency supplies of baked beans , Georgie pies , and Lion Brown to you : Bon appertit  ....

Up
0

And energy has done what in 10~15 years?

http://www.macrotrends.net/1369/crude-oil-price-history-chart

So from around 2004 the price, except for the GFC bomb has climbed and climbed.

World supply hasnt climbed but world demand has.

regards

Up
0

Bloody right , we should be marching up Queen Street about this

Well done Bernard for highlighting this scourge.

Monoplies , Oligopolies and one player with extreme market dominance is always bad for the economy .

And price fixing here in Aotearoa is rampant

Unfortunately we have some legislation that plays into the hands of a few ( The commerciual Fishing industry ) for example 

We actually need a Monopolies Commission for things like major takeovers , etc  such as the aggregation in the Short term Insurance Industry .

These  problems of price fixing  exist in many sectors including

  • Building materials (Oligopoly)
  • Potable Water in Auckland ( Watercare is a Monoploy)
  • Retail food ( Superrmarkets)
  • Short term insurance
  • Advertising ( including Trade me )
  • Dairy ( near Monoploy)
  • Red Meat
  • Chicken
  • fresh Fish ( single channel marketing has led to price rigging)
  • Cellular communication ( this is why Kiwis text because calls are too dear)
  • Fuel ( Petrol and diesel)

You will notice that where we do have strong competition , the prices are more reasonable and comparable with Australia

  • Clothing
  • Footwear
  • Wine , beer and spirits
  • Fresh fruit
  • Vegetables
  • Bread
  • Motor vehicles
  • Airfares
  • Fast food

 

 

 

Up
0

There must have been potential competition in the past that have done the exercise of setting up in NZ but the numbers just don't stack up. The South Island must be a nightmare - only 1 million people spread across 150000 mountainous square kilometres.

Up
0

Andrewj - it's rather disgusting but not surprising. The only thing an individual can do is inform themselves and buy the highest standard of organic certified food.

 

I was told recently that NZ exports most of its lactose as it is of a good quality and then imports cheap lactose of poor quality to use locally. Have you heard anything on this?

 

Interesting peer reviewed paper on Glyphosate and its destruction on human and soil good bacteria

entropy
ISSN 1099-4300
www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy

Entropy 2013, 15, 1416-1463; doi:10.3390/e15041416

Hoping the link above works ok.

And then there is this article.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/12/23/soil-qual…

 

I have no faith in any of the authorities to do their job in NZ.  Some of the information and studies coming out on food and soil is making the tobacco companies look like saints by comparison.

 

 

Up
0

I had a meeting this week with some ranchers.   They are getting impacted by this drought, although we must have had 4" over the last few days.

  They were interested in winter crops, I suggested oats and italian ryes. Im no longer a fan of glyphosphate and direct drilling. Suggested they try chewing the paddocks out and  direct drilling without sprays. I told them that the Glyphosphate will kill the old grasses that have taken generations to adapt to the climate and soils.  Free advice from a Kiwi.

 

  I am horrified by places like where I used to work in Alberta, and the total dependence on Glyphosphate. Farmers who direct drill become totally dependent on hundreds if not thousands of liters of glyphospahte.

 My vineyard is now organic but I was always weary of roundup.  Vineyards apply at least 4-5 liters a hectare, 4 times a year and have forever. Its got to be a killer.  Work out how much they use in a decade or even two.

 Im a fan of Wendel Berry

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendell_Berry

 

Ideas[edit]

Berry's nonfiction serves as an extended conversation about the life he values. According to him, the good life includes sustainable agriculture, appropriate technologies, healthy rural communities, connection to place, the pleasures of good food, husbandry, good work, local economics, the miracle of life, fidelity, frugality, reverence, and the interconnectedness of life. The threats Berry finds to this good simple life include: industrial farming and the industrialization of life, ignorance, hubris, greed, violence against others and against the natural world, the eroding topsoil in the United States, global economics, and environmental destruction. As a prominent defender of agrarian values, Berry's appreciation for traditional farming techniques, such as those of the Amish, grew in the 1970s, due in part to exchanges with Draft Horse Journal publisher Maurice Telleen. Berry has long been friendly to and supportive of Wes Jackson, believing that Jackson's agricultural research at The Land Institute lives out the promise of "solving for pattern" and using "nature as model."

  

Up
0

Some interesting stuff AJ.

Up
0

Bernard have you stop simultaenously publishing here and in the NZHerald? Is this a temporary or permanent change?

Up
0

The Herald didn't have room to publish this one. I had already written it so published here anyway.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Ok lets hope the Herald and other MSM find space to publish this sort of article in the future. : )

Up
0

Does anybody see this battle between centralised concentrated power whether corporate or government and more localised solutions as the major battle of our times? In the 70s and 80s battled lines were around how to control inflation now it is this. It is so new we don't have the words for it.

 

Neoliberalism, Keynesian, Socialism, Monetarism none of it seems to apply.

 

Maybe just straight liberalism harking back to original concerns of previous centuries....

 

If anyone can wade through the 200+ comments about Local Government here in my opinion the problem boils down to centralism versus localism.

 

 

Up
0

New Zealand when it transitioned to democracy somehow did not gain the full complement of liberal decentralised political institutions. We don't elect a President. We have no Upper house or Federal government system. Our Local government is weak and powerless. All government institutions existence comes from legislation and democratic rule of law but in practice are heavily influenced by the executive (who under MMP have always been elected by minority vote). See this article on ACC to how the government of the day manipulates so called independent government corporations.

 

The trend world wide for a long time, say 50 years has been for greater centralisation. It is my belief because NZ lacks those liberal checks and balances that the problem as Bernard highlights has become so acute.

 

I believe this could actually easily be fixed. The Speaker of Parliament could be appointed by unanimous (or nearly so, say 95%) vote in Parliament. This would immediately give a neutral referee in Parliament. Further the Speaker could appoint the important officials that maintain the delicate web that support the competitive market. The judiciary, the Commerce Commission, etc.

 

Personally I don't understand why the smaller parties don't insist on this.

 

LG wise reforms along the lines that Kumbel, Dale and myself discuss here would massively increase the freedoms and decrease the costs on the average citizen.

 

Power to the people I say.

 

 

Up
0

Better late than never Bernard, good that you have come around to this view too. Now let's hope other media pile in as well. But it will be a long fight - the rot being so deep in NZ.

Up
0

I don't think regulation will help - the best approach in a small country like ours is for the government to compete. Kiwimarket, Kiwiinsure, etc. Ok its not the core role of a government, blah blah blah - but it works, so why not! Of course they need to be run as independant SOEs...

 

Without Kiwibank we would all be paying much higher interest rates and bank fees. 

Up
0

I dont agree on the Govn competing, I dont think it can,shouldnt and doesnt need to in many areas. Now some areas where we need resiliance and that support and economy such as power provision, yes, though via the  SOE model. Public healthcare, yes, its a proven lowest cost model, pay extra if you want more.

I very much dont think its the Govn's job to be in such markets like say general insurance. There should be enough private businesses willing to compete, especially as the Internet opens things up.

Good regulation will help, improving it as things change or the un-intended comes along, yes.

regards

 

 

Up
0

But SOE's are not independent, check my article a few posts up.

 

Totally different behaviour from ACC depending on who was in power. Yet no change in legislation, no announced policy changes, no oversight from parliament, no democratic input.

 

Our government's are increasingly using patronage to rule. Civil servants are more interested in following the 'winds of change' coming from their superiors than enacting their democratic mandate.

 

Some call it democratic dictatorship. I think it is more of the latter than former.

 

Patronage was the power base of Royalty before the liberal democratic revolution of previous centuries. How did we get back to this?

Up
0

SOE's should be made more independant IMHO. I agree on the patronage as an issue, of course that is rife in some ways.  ie on the public side Ex-MPs getting board director jobs and on the private side a person holding multiple directorships, all one big cosy club.

Civil servants really dont take risks as it can be a bad outcome (loss of job) and little gain and so yes follow "instructions" Im not awae they have as such a  democratic mandate, that is the Govn's position/job.

"Patronage and royalty" did we ever get away from it? maybe we did to an extent (or maybe not) , who to blame? surely ourselves for voting as we do.

How do we fix it? not sure we can do much better than what we have, it has to be workable.

regards

 

Up
0

What "democratic mandate" do civil servants have, that you seem to think should trump the "wind of change coming from their superiors" - by which I assume you mean the policies of the elected Government? 

 

 

Up
0

In a democracy it is a civil servants duty to enact democatically elected legislation. Parliament is democratic. Key, Clark or Muldoon etc are are not civil servants superiors and they should not be using patronage to bypassing the democratic system.

 

What is the point in the rule of law if the government through patronage encourages the avoidance of it?

Up
0

Your case then is that Ministers should not have any decision-making power delegated to them - only Parliament can make decisions? 

 

 

 

 

Up
0

I think organisations that are portrayed as independent, like SOE's, ACC, commerce commission, the judiciary etc should really be independent.

Up
0

scary stuff

Up
0

Great article. Lets not forget the governments own fairly recent

contribution to inflation by increasing the GST rate to 15%

Up
0