Labour leader Chris Hipkins has kicked off the 2026 election year with twin pledges, vowing not to toll the existing Auckland Harbour Bridge to fund a second harbour crossing, and promising to scrap the Government’s proposed liquefied natural gas import terminal if Labour takes office before contracts are signed.
In his State of the Nation address in Auckland, Hipkins framed the election as a “choice between two futures”, casting Labour’s platform as a cost of living to-do list focused on; “Jobs. Health. Homes.” and a New Zealand-made economic strategy.
"We need change, and Labour knows how," he said.
"A future made in New Zealand. Not made for us, made by us."
Criticism came in fast, NZ First leader Winston Peters posting on X, calling him Chris “softy” Hipkins and accusing him of delivering "one of the most boring State of the Nation speeches in recorded history".
"No new policy. No new plan. No new announcements - apart from announcing they will announce policy later - maybe he’s just waiting for the Greens and TPM to fill in the gaps," he said.
While National deputy Nicola Willis said the speech "read like a lump of jelly, filled with platitudes and sentiment, but no concrete plans".
"Chat GPT could have written that speech," Willis said, "He actually needs to have constructive ideas for the future."
The Government earlier this month announced it would build a liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal as soon as 2027 to remove the risk associated with dry years. LNG is natural gas that has been cooled and liquified so it can be transported easily.
Hipkins said the “answer isn't to lock New Zealand into volatile global energy markets, it's to invest in cheap, clean power right here at home in New Zealand”.
“We don't support it. We won't support it. And if we're in government before a deal is done, we won't go through with it.”
Hipkins said Labour would not try to do everything in its first term, instead it would focus “on what matters most - and we will deliver”.
“We won't add new charges onto people - like increasing every household's power bill to pay for a gas import terminal, or tolling the Auckland Harbour Bridge to pay for a new crossing.
“Labour supports a second harbour crossing. But we won't penalise people for using the one that already exists."
The Infrastructure Commission has put a proposal of a $9 toll on the table for the current and future Auckland harbour crossings, saying its proposal reflects the maximum sustainable toll to help fund the multi-billion-dollar project.
Analysis from the Commission suggested it could bring in $7 billion to $9 billion, as unlike road upgrades, it was unlikely to be funded through normal revenues.
Transport Minister Chris Bishop last week stressed the Government had not made a decision on the second crossing.
“I get people want certainty. But also when you're spending like 15 billion bucks of government money on a new bridge or tunnel - not saying one or the other. People would want us to take a proper process around it, I don’t think that’s unreasonable.”
Finance Minister Nicola Willis on RNZ called the toll proposal a “completely hypothetical scenario in the Infrastructure Commission's plan”.
Hipkins used his speech to have a go at the Government, saying voters could; “choose a government that backs New Zealand businesses to compete and succeed, or one whose entire plan is to wait and hope foreign investors solve our problems”.
10 Comments
So the first lolly scramble is a "free" $20 billion (plus) bridge?
...from the party that wasted $55 million on consultants studying how to take bicycles across the current bridge
That study said they could build a cycle and rail bridge for around 2 billion. Hard to justify another 18 billion for more cars that have nowhere to go at the other end. But when money is free it’s all fine…
Don't forget how transparent Grant Roberston was (sarc)
Committing to not doing two things, in which the current government is still in the planning stage, does not constitute policy.
What was Chtis Trotter's comment in a recent column - that Labour's policy was to sit very still and hope to win the election by default?
Too early to announce policy, need to save it until closer to the election. You only announce unpopular policy this far out, like capital gains tax, and hope it’s forgotten.
Labour have a long track record of not announcing policy programs at all, particularly if they know people won't vote them in to act on it.
Exhibit A: He Puapua
But it was a National government that lined us up on that track and pulled the starter gun:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/kahu/nats-give-in-to-maori-over-rights-decla…
National has bowed to Maori Party wishes and agreed to support the highly contentious United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples despite the previous Labour Government issuing dire warnings that the document is fundamentally incompatible with New Zealand's constitutional and legal systems.
As usual, Labour and Hipkins say what they won't do but fail to enlighten the electorate with what it's policies are.
The state of the nation is that NZ is still recovering from the disastrous 6 years of Hipkins' last government from 2017 - 2023. The honourable thing Chippy should do is apologize and resign.
The poor sod failed in at least 2 portfolios before failing as a prime minister, and he still comes back for more.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.