In this time of extreme economic stress, New Zealand's lifelines are its international trade relationships built on a growing set of FTAs. Guy Trafford assesses the health of these arrangements

In this time of extreme economic stress, New Zealand's lifelines are its international trade relationships built on a growing set of FTAs. Guy Trafford assesses the health of these arrangements

New Zealand has negotiated 10 successful free trade agreements (FTAs). To date they have been with countries in Asia with some of the Americas added on as well, but with the USA being the notable absentee.

New Zealand has generally been supportive of FTAs as they allow us to access markets with no or reduced tariffs and barriers and therefore utilise our competitive advantages predominantly in food production and access cheaper products in return - so working properly a win-win for all parties.

So when New Zealand began negotiations with the EU to try and further  exports, mostly dairy,  access I was always sceptical  that any meaningful agreement could be reached. Anyone who has seen the French farmers in particular protesting against anything that may impinge upon their markets and potential profitability will know what I mean. 1,000 tractors rolling down the Champs-Élysées, dumping manure outside President Macron’s office, more manure being dumped outside Toulouse town hall are all examples of the lengths they are prepared to go to. Some of these examples are protests against a potential FTA with Canada. In this case French farmers believed imported beef has lower standards than the local beef. They are protesting against potential use of growth hormones and the feeding of GM feeds to animals.

New Zealand announced intentions to try and get a FTA with the EU way back in 2009  with the first round of talks being held in July 2018. Not surprisingly the bulk of New Zealand exports are made up predominantly of agricultural goods (73%) and the EU takes over 13% of New Zealand exports. A quite different macro picture of the EU  export emerges with manufactured goods making up the bulk (86%) and only 0.2% of total trade.

However, looks are misleading and the trade balance currently is heavily in the EU favour for goods and services by nearly a factor of 2.

In the last couple of days details of what the EU have put on the table have been revealed and Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker has been quite vocal in his disappointment with what is on offer. Essentially it focuses around dairy products and New Zealand wishing to gain greater access for our products. What has been offered for agricultural products equates to the EU being able to export around 1kg of cheese into New Zealand for every New Zealander while we can export 3 grams into the EU for every individual.

Minister Parker has accused the EU of adopting protectionist policies with even the dairy offer coming with strings with agricultural products being “subject to volume restrictions and a prohibitively high tariff.” At this stage the French farmers can remain relaxed as their officials are certainly protecting their interests.

Where the FTA goes from here is anyone’s guess, but rapid progress is highly unlikely.

New Zealand tends to always take the moral high ground in these situations and so we are still likely to see the importation of subsidised, cheap cheeses and pork among other items coming from the EU which unfairly compete against domestically produced products.

The problems New Zealand are meeting with the EU are not surprising in this post Covid-19 world. While the government may like to see world trade freed up, even before the virus for the likes of the US the reverse was happening. President Trump threatening to withdraw the US from the WTO if it doesn’t bend to his views and putting on additional tariffs on imported goods from many countries, including New Zealand, meant the US was leading the way in policies which many countries are now adopting. Namely protecting their own industries and trying to reduce imports in the process.

New Zealand is fortunate in that the countries we already have FTAs with, with the exception of Australia and Canada, are countries that are generally happy to receive our agricultural products. They are also able in the main able to supply most the goods we want. Ironically one area that they may be deficient in are some of the heavy agricultural products such as tractors.

Now that New Zealand is one of the leading countries to eliminate the Covid-19 virus it remains to be seen as to whether or not we can capitalise on this ‘advantage’. The mere fact that our dominant exports are food based makes trading with us more attractive than many other products.

The WTO last year developed a WTO Trade Barometer and nothing on it is surprising. World trade (May 20 report) shows it plummeting and no sign of a ‘pull out’ in sight ...

... except, that is, for agricultural products and while below what they were appear to be plateauing (at 96% of trend)

This is being reflected in some products within New Zealand with Kiwifruit experiencing record sales and sheep meat still maintaining good levels. The potato chip threat from cheap EU imports, covered a week or two back, seems to be getting taken seriously by our Government, with Potatoes New Zealand having had a meeting with Minister Faafoi last week to discuss investigating the potential importation of heavily discounted frozen potato chips into New Zealand.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


I would doubt there would one voice in opposition to fta's if indeed, that was what they were, and nothing more, I buy stuff off "X" country and I sell stuff to "Y" country. I think anyone reading these pages does not need me to make a list of things that fta's should not include.

What a pity an entrepreneurial NZder didn't develop something useful like "TractorLab" instead of the more glamorous but useless "RocketLab".

I think thats a bit unfair to Rocketlab , they seem to have broken into a market (payloads into orbit) that to the outsider seemed impossible. As for "Tractorlab" the world already has plenty of farm machinery manufacturers trying to invent or at least repackage the next must have.
Biotech has been the squandered opportunity in NZ primary industries for the last 25 years. Mothers Against Genetic Engineering (remember them) , and then a labour green coaltion of the early 2000s killed any innovation we may have had .

The EU is a protectionist cartel, it is why it came into being.

Letting China into the WTO has buggered the WTO, it is now unreformable, as is the UN, for the same reason.

Both are imperialist in their thought process, as is the US.

We should be promoting a reasonably free trade zone of like minded countries, based on SE Asia, Japan, Britain and India and creating the institutional framework and membership rules to make it successful.

Yes I agree on a free trade zone, However, Britain on PAPER have left the EU now, but are still in negotiation with the EU until early next year and still not able to negotiate with countries outside the EU block. When they are completely free, we do not know what will happen, it still unknown. India has many many issues within its borders and peoples so for them to get Free Trade will not be easy. SE Asia and japan and Singapore more likely.

"We should be promoting a reasonably free trade zone of like minded countries, based on..."

We're already attempting that in the form of CPTPP and RCEP. China is hardly the WTO's biggest problem. They lowered almost all their tariffs to around 10 percent when they joined and are by no means the biggest party pooper. It's traditionally been India which is far more protectionist and sadly right now its the USA :(, a former champion of low tariffs (albeit a big user of agricultural subsidies).

The more I read about fta's the more skeptical I become about our leadership & their abilities (if any) to negotiate anything positive on our behalf. What about the China FTA I hear you say? Well you're right, this is a good fta, until you get to the part which says "You will let our well behaved & wonderful Chinese people come & live in your beautiful country, so we (China) can politically influence & commercially manipulate you (NZ) to become an loyal outpost of the Han Dynasty."
About then it starts going backwards.

Reality: NZ has done bloody well out of the China trade deal despite having had very little to negotiate with. China is providing NZ duty-free access to a 1 billion-person market and on labour market access New Zealand only conceded access for "up to 1,800 skilled Chinese workers to enter New Zealand on work permits each year for work in both specialised fields such as Chinese traditional medicine, Mandarin language teaching, chefs specialising in Chinese cuisine, tour guides, and martial arts teachers, and in areas of specified skills shortage."

For years our Australian competitors didn't have a deal and the US, EU and Canada still don't have one.

Yes, well, on that very topic, we did have the ability to close the door on foreign buyers in our housing market, until along came the Key govt who did not see to it we could do that when they signed the fta with Sth Korea, and we had to offer that same deal to China. They very deliberately opened us up to foreign investment.
I think if you look back you will see a very different China to the one that began to emerge once the foot was in the door, for me that time was marked with the sale of the Crafar Farms to Shanghai Pengxin.
AND when the idea of allowing rich people to buy their way into NZ (also a Labour initiative) by investing, it particularly excluded residential property investment as a means of buying in. How many guesses will it take for you to name which govt it was that allowed residential property investment as a way to achieve preferred investor status. (I can only spare you one vote, hint, it was in 2011)

"the countries we already have FTAs with, with the exception of Australia and Canada are generally happy to receive our agricultural products."
hmmm... Canada definitely but how did the author come up with Australia? Yes, I know about the apples case which we won but other than that, Australia has long been the most open to our major export items of dairy, beef and lamb. And what about Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Indonesia? We have FTAs with all those markets and unlike Australia, we've had to fight hard for every scrap of agricultural market access we have in those markets. Ask around.

The point was that they  Australia) don't need much of what we produce. Whereas most of the other nations generally do. Apolgies if not better put.