Government won't appeal High Court ruling ordering Overseas Investment Office to set aside and reconsider Crafar farm sale, PM Key says

Government won't appeal High Court ruling ordering Overseas Investment Office to set aside and reconsider Crafar farm sale, PM Key says

The government will not appeal the High Court's ruling last month ordering the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) to set aside and reconsider its decision to allow the Crafar farms to be sold to a Chinese company, Prime Minister John Key says.

Speaking to media at his post-Cabinet press conference on Monday, Key said the government had "looked closely at it and we’ve decided not to,” when asked whether the government would appeal Justice Forrest Miller's ruling.

The OIO gave approval in January for Chinese company Shanghai Pengxin to purchase the 16 Crafar farms after spending nine months considering Pengxin's bid, which is thought to offer in the region of NZ$210 million for the farms.

But a rival consortium of New Zealand investors led by merchant banker Michael Fay, which has publicly said it would pay NZ$171.5 million for the farms, challenged the OIO's decision via a judicial review in the High Court. 

In February, Justice Forrest Miller of the High Court ruled the OIO had not applied the Overseas Investment Act correctly when assessing the economic benefits that would flow from Pengxin's bid, and ordered the OIO to set aside and reconsider its decision.

See previous article, Overseas Investment Office has to revise Crafar farms decision by applying new test of what a hypothetical New Zealand buyer would do.

At first, the OIO said it would make its revised decision within a matter of days, although that has stretched out to almost a month now as they had to wait for legal advice from Crown Law on how to apply the High Court ruling.

Key had not previously ruled out the government appealing the High Court ruling, but had indicated that it would not be likely.

The rival New Zealand consortium, called the Crafar Farms Independent Purchaser Group (CFIPG) is appealing part of Justice Miller's ruling, which said the OIO had applied business experience requirements in the Overseas Investment Act correctly. The consortium argued Pengxin did not have experience in dairy farming.

Pengxin responded by noting its agribusiness experience, which included ownership of sheep-breeding operations in China, and cropping farms in China and South America.

The Crafar farms group was tipped into receivership in October 2009 owing about NZ$216 million to its lenders Westpac, Rabobank and PGG Wrightson Finance after interest.co.nz revealed animal welfare issues at the farms. KordaMentha is the receiver.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

1 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

While my preference is to have local dodgey dealers to secure the farms Alex, it would,... I take it ,...not preclude the onsell........ by the very altruisticly motivated Fay consortium.
 Likewise the review by the OIO  is not obliged to reach another decision contrary to the one it has made...? provided it can satisfy the criteria on a second sweep...? and withstand a further legal challenge by the very noble CFIPG.
 I don't know that Sir Micheal farms that many head on Mercury Island...more of a bird stopover type operation really ...at least when the pair had to satisfy the crown for the purchase it was based on DOC's flightpath protection scheme being satisfied and preserved on the Island.