sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

NZ First wants to buy BNZ from its Aussie parent, and merge it with Kiwibank to create 'a National Bank of New Zealand', says Winston Peters

Banking / news
NZ First wants to buy BNZ from its Aussie parent, and merge it with Kiwibank to create 'a National Bank of New Zealand', says Winston Peters
BNZ sign

NZ First leader Winston Peters is proposing the Government "buys back" BNZ from the National Australia Bank (NAB), and merges it with Kiwibank, creating a “National Bank of New Zealand to keep the major Australian banks honest and to keep New Zealand banking profits in NZ."

In a speech in West Auckland on Sunday, Peters said this was a campaign policy announcement, ahead of the November 7 election.

He said a “National Bank of New Zealand” wouldn't be a government department, rather it'd be a fully commercial bank with a Crown shareholder, run on new management structure to be detailed in election campaign announcements.

Peters said a buying the BNZ wouldn't be funded from the Government's operating budget, rather via "a blended funding stack" including;

·A New Zealand Sovereign Banking Bond issuance, marketed to domestic retail and KiwiSaver investors as a direct economic-sovereignty instrument.

·Long-dated Crown debt at current sovereign rates. BNZ currently generates more than $1.5 billion in annual cash earnings – comfortably servicing the debt and returning a surplus to the Crown.

·A limited tranche of the NZ Future Fund and ACC investment, structured as a commercial equity at arm’s length and a market rate of return.

·Retention of Kiwibank’s existing capital base.

"The buy-back is self-financing in expectation. The fiscal impact is a one-off balance-sheet expansion, not an ongoing cost. This is not nationalisation – this is taking back our country," Peters said.

NAB bought BNZ in late 1992 in a deal valued at NZ$1.48 billion with key sellers being 57.3% shareholder the Government, and 27% holder Fay, Richwhite. This followed a tumultuous period for the bank, detailed in this Reserve Bank paper here.

In 2013 interest.co.nz reported Sydney-based Deutsche Bank analysts valued BNZ at A$6.219 billion in a sum of the parts valuation.

"New Zealand First will be proposing a buy-back of the Bank of New Zealand from National Australia Bank," Peters said.

"It will be merged with Kiwibank to form the 'National Bank of New Zealand (NBNZ)' – a fully Crown owned, commercially run, systemically significant domestic bank with the scale to genuinely compete with ANZ, ASB and Westpac.  After all, when National sold BNZ to NAB in November 1992, it then had six of every 10 New Zealand banking customers."  

"This is a buy-back to put a New Zealand owned competitor on the field at the scale required to change the behaviour of the foreign-owned banks," said Peters.

"This will create real competitive pressure on the Australian owned banks – a domestically owned strategic lender capable of supporting agriculture, infrastructure, and Small to Medium Enterprises growth on long-horizon terms."

"Kiwibank, the only domestically owned bank of any scale, currently holds just under 8 percent of the mortgage market," Peters added.

Peters said Crown-owned commercial banks "are normal in serious economies" such as Singapore, Norway, Germany, Canada and France.

"New Zealand is the outlier – and we are going to change that."

The speech didn't say whether the Australian Securities Exchange listed NAB could be expected to be a willing seller.

Here's more from Peters' speech;

New Zealand will be buying back the BNZ bank.

Four Australian owned banks control around 85 percent of the system. They lend our deposits back to us at margins that are materially higher than those earned by their parent groups in Australia. Billions of dollars of profits a year that flow across the Tasman.

New Zealand First will be proposing a buy-back of the Bank of New Zealand from National Australia Bank.

It will be merged with Kiwibank to form the “National Bank of New Zealand (NBNZ)” – a fully Crown owned, commercially run, systemically significant domestic bank with the scale to genuinely compete with ANZ, ASB and Westpac.  After all, when National sold BNZ to NAB in November 1992, it then had six of every ten New Zealand banking customers.  

This is a buy-back to put a New Zealand owned competitor on the field at the scale required to change the behaviour of the foreign-owned banks.

This will create real competitive pressure on the Australian owned banks – a domestically owned strategic lender capable of supporting agriculture, infrastructure, and Small to Medium Enterprises growth on long-horizon terms.

Kiwibank, the only domestically owned bank of any scale, currently holds just under 8 percent of the mortgage market.

The ‘Commerce Commission 2024 Personal Banking’ market study, showed a structurally uncompetitive market in which the major banks face no sustained pressure to compete on price, no realistic threat of new entry at scale, and no domestic ownership accountability.

Kiwibank was created in 2002 precisely to provide a domestic challenger. But after two decades it remains a marginal player.

Successive governments have starved it of the capital it would need to be a genuine system-shaping competitor.

The “National Bank of New Zealand” would not be a government department. It would be a fully commercial bank with a Crown shareholder, but run on new management structure which we will outline in upcoming campaign announcements.  

The “National Bank of New Zealand” would exist to keep the major Australian banks honest and to keep New Zealand banking profits in New Zealand.

Crown-owned commercial banks operating at scale are not radical. They are normal in serious economies – Singapore, Norway, Germany, Canada, France, all have large-scale state-owned banks that have serious stakes in the market.

New Zealand is the outlier – and we are going to change that.

New Zealand built BNZ. Labour and National sold it. Now we are going to buy it back. 

Every dollar of profit it makes will stay in this country, working for New Zealanders. 

That is what economic sovereignty looks like. That is what real conservatism looks like. That is what real Nationalism looks like.

And that’s what ‘added-value’ looks like for our country. 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

25 Comments

That will cost a pretty penny. Just like when the Aussies sold us Ansett, and sold us Kiwirail back. Both with assivr deferred maintenance and a stupid valuation. Surely using the budgeted spend to inject capital into Kiwibank could achieve the same outcome?

Up
4

The difference between Kiwibank & BNZ isn't just their capitalisation, its their culture. Public servants don't get it, ever.

For the sam reason (& a multitude of others)  it would be a serious mistake for the govt to renationalise the BNZ

Up
9

Yes some might remember that before it collapsed the BNZ was the big fish in the little pond of NZ, and pretty conceited about it too. That self satisfaction and hubris was part of their great undoing. When Rogernomics let the shackles off the banking system , they soon discovered that they knew not how to either compete or lend.

Up
4

This is kind of assuming NAB would sell something that profitable at any price short of the completely insane.

And if it is compulsorily acquired (i.e. nationalised by purchase) what signal does that send to the market?

It's also a massive vote of no-confidence in Kiwibank's ability to grow if given adequate resources and capital - which might be a cheaper option.

Up
5

Misses the combined Balance Sheet of NAB which allows cheaper international funding... 

Why not just start Winnie Mae or Winnie Mac?

that would be game changing, death by 1000 cuts

Up
4

Buying back the BNZ is bonkers. What would that cost? $7 billion? The state can regulate banks as much as it wants, or levy windfall taxes, without owning them. That $7 billion would be better spent renationalising all the electricity gentailers and merging them into a state agency that delivers electricity to people and businesses at cost. Sell Kiwibank for money to do that and get the rest of the capital from the NZ Superannuation Fund.

Up
5

I agree. The answer is no way to NZ First idea

Up
1

Let's do a back-of-the-envelope calculation. (Surely Winston would have done this, but maybe not while soberly thinking it through.) BNZ makes about NZ$1.5 bln after tax per year. The current price/earnings ratio on the ASX200 is about 18 times. For banks it is 20 times.  So is Peters really saying he would use public resources to pay about $22 bln? That is only the standard starting point. It is likely the NAB board would need a premium to that to get interested. Another 20%?

What's your bid, Winston? Without that, it lacks cred.

For reference, his government's Vote Health is $26.6 bln, Vote Education is $21.5 bln, National Super is $21.6 bln.

 

Up
11

Sobering!

Up
2

maybe he is sniffing maybe one or more of the big 4 may want to sell its NZ "branch"

no one else will ever buy them... he could get a deal yet.... which one.

still winnie mae/mac is the real answer, with a variable compulsary kiwi saver contribution vs big OCR moves... brakes on = increased savings vs money leaving NZ.

Up
2

WPAC also possible sale imho

Up
0

WNZL is a nice little earner for WPAC, but yes if the price is right..

WPAC may grow tied of RBNZ's ever increasing branch compliance requirements

Up
0

Just thinking out loud here, but if BNZ and Kiwibank were merged, that would be combine BNZ's ~120 275 branches with Kiwibank's 55 (plus their 80 "retail partners"). Why would the combined bank need the Kiwibank outlets then? The BNZ network has all the prime positions.

And because BNZ's tech and tech capabilities will be far better than Kiwibank's, that would mean writing off Kiwibank's systems. (I doubt any board would write off the BNZ infrastructure they just paid a premium for.) You can be sure the systems could not be combined in any meaningful way, and no bank board would want to run both.

Essentially Winston is proposing closing Kiwibank because he is acknowledging it can't compete. That should be the headline! (Someone just had a late night rush of blood to come up with this proposal.)

So would Winston sell Kiwibank based on this acknowledgement? He might get some support from his coalition partners.

Up
5

That well illustrates some of the nuts and the bolts of the matter and that in turn brings to mind those ninnies that fiddled with the nuts and the bolts of that big electricity pylon up north and then found out exactly what the wrong spanner in the wrong works can do. 

Up
3

Yeah. But they couldn't care less. Unbelievably "...the current code did not apply to outside contractors, such as the French-owned company Omexom, which was working on the pylon at the time."

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/regions_northland/595240/no-prosecution-over…

 

Up
1

So...who would buy Kiwibank and all the related capital investment required?

Up
0

I must admit I'm getting worried about Winston. I think he picks up something that the voters may very well like but as most of these grand ideas which sound good but require much background number crunching and that's beyond Winnie. Maybe he has a confidential banker and economist who have done some homework. I hope so.

Up
1

He has a long and varied memory. Was it not his outrage, and justifiably so, that the reasons and accountability for the collapse of the BNZ were shoved like skeletons into a cupboard and nailed shut, that saw him resign from the National government. The old clock may have ticked around to strike an old chime. If you think about it, you might well ask then,  was that BNZ scandal then the reason why we have WP & NZF today?

Up
2

You must remember Winston is a (consummate) politician...it dosnt need to make sense, it just needs to appeal (to enough).

Up
3

This doesn't make sense. There must be other ways. 

Up
2

Not a bad idea if it were merged with Kiwibank. Kiwibank will never get on its feet as a serious competitor because the government doesn't take it seriously. A least Winnie is proposing something with some substance.

Up
1

MikeM7382,

It's pure Politics. He knows his coalition partners won't back the idea. It's unaffordable and as David Chaston points out, it would effectively mean Kiwibank disappearing. 

Up
5

Not sure why this is even news, never going to happen.

Up
1

Some academic was going on that the banking move would upset a lot of things.  Well yes.  And good.

Up
1