sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Statistics NZ reports CPI inflation of 0.3% in Sept qtr as higher housing related costs more than offset lower ACC levies; Annual inflation 0.4%; Economists had expected 0.2% for qtr and 0.3 for year

Statistics NZ reports CPI inflation of 0.3% in Sept qtr as higher housing related costs more than offset lower ACC levies; Annual inflation 0.4%; Economists had expected 0.2% for qtr and 0.3 for year

By Bernard Hickey

Inflation was slightly stronger than most economists expected in the September quarter because the lower New Zealand dollar led to more imported inflation, but domestic inflation remained subdued because of ACC levy cuts and free doctor's visits for kids.

Economists said the result was unlikely to shift the Reserve Bank's thinking much on when it would next cut the Official Cash Rate, with most still predicting a pause on October 29 before a final cut to 2.5% on December 10. The overall result was in line with the Reserve Bank's forecast.

Statistics New Zealand reported the Consumer Price Index rose 0.3% in the September quarter from the June quarter as higher housing related costs more than offset a fall in ACC levies.

Annual inflation was 0.4% in the September quarter from the same quarter a year ago, which was unchanged from annual inflation of 0.4% in the June quarter.

Economists had expected quarterly inflation of 0.2% and annual inflation of 0.3% so the result was slightly higher than expected, but non-tradable inflation was flat for the quarter, which was the weakest result since March 2001. Annual non-tradable inflation of 1.5% was the lowest since the December quarter of 2001. ACC levy cuts for cars and increased subsidies for doctors visits by children were a factor.

The result was in line with the Reserve Bank's September Monetary Policy Statement forecast for 0.3% inflation in the quarter, although flat tradable inflation was weaker than the Reserve Bank's 0.1% forecast.

"The main upward contribution came from housing-related prices, which increased 1.2 percent,” said prices senior manager Chris Pike.

"This was mostly influenced by higher prices for local authority rates, new houses excluding land, and housing rentals," he said.

Vegetable prices rose14% in the September 2015 quarter and package holiday prices rose 7.5%.

Prices for tradable goods and services rose 0.7% in the quarter, with the weaker New Zealand dollar influencing prices for overseas package holidays and petrol.

Non-tradable goods and services showed no overall change, as housing-related price rises were offset by lower vehicle relicensing fees and increased subsidies for GP visits for children.

Housing and household utility prices were up 2.7% in the year, with higher prices for newly built houses excluding land (up 5.5%), housing rentals (up 2.3%), and local authority rates (up 5.9%).

"The annual increase was influenced by housing-related prices, particularly in Auckland," Pike said.

"Auckland prices for new houses excluding land were up 8.5%, and housing rentals and rates also increased by more than the national average."

Economist reaction

Westpac Chief Economist Dominick Stephens said overall inflation was slightly stronger than expected because tradable inflation 0.7% was a bit higher than forecast, although non-tradable inflation was weaker than expected.

"This reflects genuinely subdued inflation domestic inflation pressures as well as the decline in ACC levies," he said, adding Westpac was likely to reduce its December quarter CPI forecast by 0.1% after today's data.

"Our long-held view has been that low inflation will force the Reserve Bank to reduce the OCR below 2.5% in 2016," Stephens said.

"By contrast, the RBNZ argues that the lower exchange rate will prompt sufficient inflation, meaning the OCR will only need to fall to 2.5%. Today's data leans more in favour of the RBNZ's view, but only slightly," he said, adding that Westpac was due to publish research indicating very subdued inflation next year.

"Consequently, today's surprise is not sufficient to dissuade us from forecasting a 2.0% low-point in the OCR."

ANZ Senior Economist Mark Smith said the market would be watching the Reserve Bank's publication of its core inflation measures at 3pm. It was 1.4% in the June quarter from a year ago and has been below the mid point of the Reserve Bank's 1-3% target for 22 consecutive quarters.

"Signs of stabilisation on the activity front, and the need to keep some powder dry given downside economic risks, will likely encourage the RBNZ to pause over the remainder of the year," Smith said.

"However, a negative global risk profile, concerns over NZD strength and the risk that much of the low inflation we are seeing will endure, will keep the risks tilted towards a lower OCR," he said.

"Relative to the Reserve Bank September MPS pick, the major area of surprise was higher-than-expected tradable inflation, balanced by weaker-than-expected non-tradable prices," he said, noting however the currency was currently 7% higher than the Reserve Bank's estimate for the December quarter, "which will temper the rise in headline inflation that the Bank expects next year."

"Competitive pressures are generally capping price rises in much of the tradable regimen, with falls in communication group prices, and parts of the household contents, recreation & culture groups," Smith said.

ASB Senior Economist Jane Turner said the result had removed any doubt about a pause on October 29. She now expected the next cut to be on December 10.

"However, we still have doubts that inflation pressures will rise as much over the medium term as the RBNZ currently anticipates," Turner said.

"The recent rebound in the NZD, for example, will undermine the RBNZ’s 2016 inflation outlook.  The lack of underlying non-tradables inflation and weak pricing intentions also flag the risk of weak overall inflation pressures," she said.

"Of concern for the RBNZ is the trend decline in seasonally-adjusted non-tradable inflation. Over 2014 seasonally-adjusted non-tradable inflation was running at 0.5/0.6% per quarter.  This has now slowed to 0.3/0.2% per quarter.  With growth set to slow over 2015 and 2016, we don’t expect non-tradable inflation to pick up meaningfully without further stimulus.  With this in mind, we still see some risk of further cuts to the OCR beyond 2.5% at some point in 2016."

(Updated with more detail, chart, reaction)

Consumer price index

Select chart tabs

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

20 Comments

Welcome to deflation.

Up
0

Only by redefinition to affect subsequent redistribution of wealth.

Up
0

3% mortgage rates on the way

Up
0

Yes the economy is far from strong. Beware what you wish for when you wish for lower interest rates. Low GDP growth means more unemployment and added strain on social welfare. People struggling to pay for basics. Don't we want a thriving economy which benefits more people than the current one?

Up
0

gordon - GDP is a measure of how much people spend. If incomes dont go up then how can spending increase.

Can you keep spending more and more money year after year with the same income.

Why do you thing we have record immigration.

Up
0

Global deflation arrived a few months back. Sure prices of the 'basics' might be going up but that is just a futile attempt to maintain earnings. Take a look at the earnings on the DJIA. Bear market coming soon...

Up
0

If by "basics" you mean food the increased energy cost/inputs means I wonder if they can go much lower and still remain available, no private business can sell at a loss.

Up
0

the weightings are out of wack, if most people spend 40/50% on housing but it only makes up 10/15 % of the weighting then inflation looks less than it should be.
the weightings need to reflect where and what people spend there money on nowadays
1 Housing
2 food
3 power, telephone etc
4 fuel car costs
5 etc etc

Up
0

Exactly!!! Note the impact capital consumption costs associated with extraordinary property prices are having on reduced expenditure elsewhere.

Soaring London house prices are costing the economy more than £1bn a year and preventing the creation of thousands of jobs, as individuals plough money into buying and renting instead of spending their cash elsewhere, a report has claimed. Read more

Up
0

No.

and sure ppl can invest badly in speculative housing, doesnt make it sane. There is more than enough comment that "investors" are chasing yield no matter what the risk, housing is just one more gamble. Is that due to a low OCR? or is it due to a stagnant economy where there is no growth to pay the interest demanded? for me it is the latter. ie you are blaming a symptom and not the cause.

Up
0

If a stagnant economy is the cause let's give up the ruse of printing zirp costed money to affect a change where it is not possible? - forever devaluing that which workers by necessity store the efforts of their labour is futile, if nor downright fraudulent.

The Bank of Japan has been conducting QE almost regularly for the whole of the 21st century, admitting only to being bested by a mindset; a “deflationary mindset” is thus, apparently, an order of magnitude or two more powerful than balance sheet expansion into the tens of trillions. For QE10, or QQE (which adds “qualitative” now to “quantitative”, suggesting that the quantitative needs at least more count of letters?), the idea was to just overwhelm that “irrational” emotion by wholesale fury of leaving trillions far behind and stretching toward quadrillion.

The result was the same; not just by Japanese standards, which amount to destroying the economy a little more in discrete pieces each time, but by the same as was “gained” in the US. Outside of a temporary and reversible burst of inflation, it leaves no positive lasting impact (and quite a lot of, again, negatives). Read more

Up
0

Hmm, relative effect of course. If we stop 'printing" (and QE isnt printing as is being proven) and we get a depression, well what a great outcome. Also of course accusing "printing" of being the problem "overlooks" all the other causes such as financial parasites expecting un-realistic returns or their other destructive behaviour.

"alhambrapartners" aka zerohedge....and their solution?

Meanwhile of course the same financial parasites demanding a depression will be looking to protect their ill-gotten gains at the expense of the tax paying masses and their children ie by getting the "govn" to protect their deposits etc.

Up
0

No, ie except a) if you have no mortgage or have had it for a long time your housing cost is a negligible part of your CPI. Food, power, fuel, rates etc on the other hand are all constant overheads. b) Around the rest of NZ house prices are flat or even declining so do not take up a significant price increase. c) House price gains are like shares an "investment" and not CPI.

On top of that what would be the effect of increasing the OCR? In every case that a Country has done so a worse economy has resulted eg Sweden, NZ. Get over that there is no inflation because some sectors are deflating/struggling and these are the ones that provide jobs, if ppl lose jobs due to sectors failing things will be a lot worse.

Up
0

look at the trends for home ownership in Auckland and remember that those below 25 have next to no chance of buying so within 10-15 years most will rent, and with Auckland holding 25% of NZ population OCR reductions will become less effective, as well as government expenses re housing will increase
Household home ownership is lower in Auckland than elsewhere in New Zealand
As figure 15 shows, in 1986 the home ownership rate in Auckland was very similar to the rate for the rest of New Zealand, at 73.9 percent and 73.6 percent, respectively. Since then however, a gap has appeared between home ownership rates in Auckland and elsewhere in New Zealand, with lower rates in Auckland. In 2013, 61.5 percent of Auckland households owned their home or held it in a family trust, whereas elsewhere in New Zealand, 66.2 percent of households owned their home or held it in a family trus

Up
0

Uh, OCR reductions are not for FHBs, but to keep the other parts of teh economy throughout NZ going.

The rest of your comment really is not in context, ie % of home ownership is not majorly relevant to the economy overall.

Up
0

The more my accommodation cost increases the less I spend in shops, restaurants or entertainment because I have my savings target every month, and the more employers will have to pay to attract or retain talent.

I don't even go to pubs, cafes or cinema anymore. How could I otherwise save for a deposit?

Property bubbles are always a disaster for the productive economy and long term stability. I hope we're enjoying while it lasts.

Banks seem happy though.

Up
0

bankers get bonuses to sell a product, think of them as snake oil salesmen, doesnt matter if it does damage as long as the sale is made.

Up
0

Shouldn't the rbnz forecast always be 2%? If they are forecasting less than that shouldn't they decrease the ocr?

Up
0

Basically, yes, and I think 2% seems a not un-reasonable expectation when you are flat lining at 0.3% for a protracted period and not 2.5%+.

Trouble is the complexity of the real world means the RB has multiple points of pain it has to watch. Personally I wish they were clear on why they are refusing to drop significantly. I suspect its nothing more than dogma and "praying" for it to come right is just crazy IMHO.

Up
0

Inflation/Deflation are just two sides of the same coin

The only thing that matters is which side you have put your money on

Up
0