sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

RBNZ leaves high LVR speed limit in place "at this time" because of risk of resurgence of house price inflation; warns of risk of dairy debt and China slowdown

Property
RBNZ leaves high LVR speed limit in place "at this time" because of risk of resurgence of house price inflation; warns of risk of dairy debt and China slowdown
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/">Image sourced from Shutterstock.com</a>

By Bernard Hickey

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand has surprised many in political and banking circles by deciding to leave its high LVR speed limit in place because of what it sees as a risk of a resurgence of house price inflation.

Bank economists, Finance Minister Bill English, Prime Minister John Key and real estate agents have all talked up the prospect of an imminent easing or removal of the limit, saying it was always designed to be temporary and had worked to slow housing inflation. Some talked about it being eased before Christmas.

The Reserve Bank itself has previously said it would review the limit towards the end of this year, but has always said it would need to be satisfied that house price inflation had cooled in a substantial way and would not rebound when the hand brake was released.

But the bank doused those raised expectations of an easing of the restrictions in its half yearly Financial Stability Report (FSR), saying the limit would remain in place while the risks of a resurgence of house price inflation remained.

"We have always indicated that the LVR restrictions are a temporary measure," Reserve Bank Governor Graeme Wheeler said in releasing the FSR.

"The reduction in house price inflation and housing credit growth are welcome developments, along with indications of increased residential building," he said.

"However, there remains a risk of a resurgence in house price inflation, particularly in light of strong immigration flows," he said.

"Consequently, we do not consider it appropriate to ease the LVR speed limit at this time."

The bank said later in its report that the bank "intends to ease or remove the restriction when a sustained moderation in house price inflation is achieved, and when there is a little risk of a resurgence in housing market activity."

Dairy debt warning

Elsewhere in the Financial Stability Report, the Reserve Bank warned of an increase in risks in the dairy sector and that New Zealand faced some risks from any financial market disruption from a Chinese economic slowdown.

Deputy Governor Grant Spencer said the sharply lower dairy payout could result in rising loan defaults if it continued at such low levels.

"Lower global dairy prices are in large part due to reduced demand from China, highlighting New Zealand's vulnerability to a slowdown in the Chinese economy," Spencer said.

"Risks arise both from New Zealand's large volume of trade with China, and also from any financial market disruption that could arise from a Chinese economic slowdown," he said.

System sound and stress tested

The bank said in its report that the New Zealand financial system remained sound and its banks were well capitalised with funding and liquidity buffers above the required minimums. Stress tests of all the major banks' portfolios over the last six months showed each bank had the capacity to "manage a range of significant events."

However, there were four key risks, the bank said, including imbalances in the housing market, high levels of indebtedness in dairying, the potential effects of s slowdown in the Chinese economy and the banking system's reliance on offshore funding.

These risks were the same as the bank noted in May, but their balance had shifted.

Housing market pressures had eased since the introduction of high LVR speed limits in October 2013 and the 100 basis point increase in the Official Cash Rate between March and July of this year. But dairy sector risks had increased, the bank said.

Economist reaction

ASB Chief Economist Nick Tuffley said the restrictions had been left in place as he expected and he forecast that the Reserve Bank would leave them in place until the second or third quarter of next year.

"Everything is moving in the right direction for easing the restrictions, but the criteria aren’t met at present," Tuffley said.

"More sustainable price and credit growth have been linked to household income growth.  The RBNZ cites household income growth of 4% yoy over the past 5 years.  The inference is that price and credit growth that is roughly in line with that number would be “sustainable”," he said, pointing to current house price growth nationally of 5-5.9% and credit growth of 4.7%.

"The risk of resurgence in prices is still very real.  The key risk we and the RBNZ see is net migration, which has yet to peak.  Although it could start to show signs of peaking by early 2015, in recent months the net inflow has been very strong," he said.

"The RBNZ doesn’t see any evidence that the restrictions are causing significant distortions that outweigh the benefits of the policy."

Political reaction

Labour Housing Spokesman Phil Twyford blamed the decision to leave the high LVR speed limit in place on "National’s housing policy fiasco."

“The Reserve Bank would have lifted LVRs if they had seen any increase in the supply of housing in Auckland," Twyford said.

“This is further bad news for young people looking to achieve the Kiwi dream of buying their own home, and for those in regional New Zealand who are being punished locally for the Government’s failure to fix the Auckland housing crisis," he said.

(Updated with economist and political reaction)


 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

31 Comments

An excellent decision from Mr Wheeler.

Up
0

Yes, agree.  Please they didnt let all the talking heads convince them to do something silly

 

Up
0

so you are trying / wish to burst the bubble?

Up
0

I  think the RB wants to protect the economy\ banking system from a house price crash on top of a dairy downturn.

Up
0

FYI updated with reaction from Nick Tuffley and Phil Twyford.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

'RBNZ Leave LVR Limit in Place'

 

GOODIE.

Up
0

Excellent.  

Shame they didnt bump it up to 30% or 40% though.

Up
0

and your reasoning?

Up
0

My reasoning is that it is the availabilty of credit and inelastic supply that drives house price inflation, which benefits nobody but parasite speculators and the banks.

There are still the same number of houses and the same number of people "missing out", the only question is how much debt they can enslave themselves with to outbid eachother.

Up
0

I think they should:

a) limit interest only loans only to those in dire financial situations,

b) cap loans at 20yrs

Then we would see house prices drop and the banks resilience would increase rapidly

Up
0

Happy news for landlords and investors.

More tenants will need to stay even longer in rented accommodation.

Rents are rising across the country so it's Landlords 1, FHB nil.

Up
0

Rents aren't rising all across the country Big Daddy.  And yesterdays data was that they are stable in Auckland. 

Clearly more and more 'investors' are just a go between their tenants and the banks.  Especially for new purchases.

Up
0

You would have to be taking the piss here BigDaddy. Surely no one could be so mean spirited. Not everyone has the grey matter and/or the skills to get a good enough salary to put together the deposit. People who could buy a house before the 2002/2007 lift in prices have been very lucky in their timing. But what about their children and grandchildren. Not everyone is in the position like you and me to help their kids into houses.

Up
0

DP

Up
0

Very true gordon.

 

I think BigDaddy is dabbling in some reverse psychology here - it's no coincedence volumes and price growth starting tanking around the same time LVR rules were introduced. It's a good thing FHB's are being kept out in Auckland especially - if prices correct that would be the time to buy - if prices don't correct keep renting and saving while the landlord makes a 3% net return.

Up
0

That was exactly my reasoning for taking on properties just outside my comfortable reach.
If I can't make a start in the market, my children etc never will.    

Up
0

Well done RBNZ..keeping more FHB out of the market in Auckland..while rents stay stable. 

Up
0

Glad there was a "dairy debt warning" because I havent seen one bank provide a forcast on the dairy payout beyond this year i.e 2015/16. I suspect that they are waiting for the huge number of farm auctions/tenders to go through before they make a call.

Very brave farmers are paying record prices for dairy land,  if the payout stays under $6 for the next 2 to 3 years these farmers will be sweating big time. We have become far too reliant on China, they are working towards self sufficiency so what we are currently seeing is what the international market looks like without China...given this, Dairy farmland is overpriced and we will see a correction at some stage...long run milk payout will be between $5.80 and $6.20 (Which is exactly what NZ banks were quoting before the 2013/14 record payout).

 

Up
0

How did you calculate your long term average payout?

Up
0

The last 10 years. Add in $5.30 for 2014/15 then it comes under $6.00. I believe that we have to be aware that China is working toward self sufficiency and we will have to operate without them as a direct customer of NZ derived products at some stage.

Up
0

What if the high payouts were a consequence of QE in the USA and the enourmous amount of money flowing into the markets?  ( Don't forget China was almost self sufficient before the melamine scandal.) Then your average payout would have a 4 in front of it.

 Then costs would have been unable to rise to the ridiculous levels they have today.

 

http://www.thebubblebubble.com/commodities-bubble/

Up
0

As long as Fonterra and others continue (and are allowed to continue) for a race to the bottom, then yes collapse levels of price are possible in the commodities market.

Up
0
Up
0

Yep, well ahead of consumption (sales) increases to be expected.  Translationtook a while, I don't speak imperial..

Just as well as New Zealand is still concentrating on keeping production costs down...oh wait... no we're not.     Might be why 2 of my neighbours are selling up, well established family farms too.
 Rate NZ is going Fonterra is going have little reason to find its volume here, especially cheap volume it needs for its mail order priced approach..  Buy retail sell wholesale, what can go wrong :)   Just as well they have Guaranteed Milk Price to keep shareholder suppliers bidding against each other for lowest supply price....

Wool was big and lost to cotton.
Textile was big but labour and compliance costs lost out to foreign low quality imports.
Milk was supposed to be the great saviour (last years news).
Our tech companies are struggling with the high dollar, and better deals offshore.
How is the government going to fund it's infrastructure projects and social policies and "living wage" for government employees...looks like Auckland CGT is the last great hope.. :p

I suppose they could tax David's Advertising profits, because we know how much advertising adds to our quality of life...

Up
0

Wow, US projecting just under 3b litres of extra milk in 2015. Then add the extra milk from EU post Milk Quota Removal...an aweful lot of extra milk sloshing around on the world market...Fonterra and comentators reckon that US and EU dont have the capacity in the right products to take advantage, it will be interesting to see.

 

 

Up
0

I say 5.50 to 6.30 average, peak to 7 on weather, fires, and wars. for generic milk supply.
Too many people who made their money when things were cheap and dirty, they can now operate without interest burdens on their core investment, and they're the ones holding power and influence in the market.  Basically any newcomer is betting against the house, the newcomer is starting up, paying interest, trying to buy in, against an incumberent who holds the trumphs, has no interest and no setup and has established income stream.  And no one (government, customer) has an interest in breaking the cartel-like hold because it would lift the prices 20%.

Up
0

Rents are rising due in part at least to LVR regulations.

Great for investors and about time. 

They have been subsidising the renting classes  far too long already.

The facts speak for themselves:

 

"Costs Up For Kiwi Renters

“Landlords are asking an extra $24 a week on average for many properties than they were a year ago, including an eye-watering $85 hike in Christchurch, according to Trade Me listings.
New figures from Trade Me's property division show the median weekly rent has risen more than 6 per cent in a year to $399, up from $375 in October 2013.”

 http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/63084513/Costs-up-for-Kiwi-renters

 

Up
0

It's the taxpayer subsidizing the rentier class and it's time things were put into place to make it WAAAAY less attractive for people to be leeching off others who can't afford to buy and the public purse because they can't afford the exhorbitant rents as well.

The taxpayer is getting fed up with subsidizing you lot

And the banks should be charging commercial interest rates too, if this is "business"

Up
0

Raegun - dont think you are right on the subject of accommodation supplement

 

Have you ever tried the WINZ website AS calculator?

 

I did. Tried a number of permutatons. You have to be either disabled, unemployed, a beneficiary of some form, or extremely financially disadvantaged to even get it

 

The fact there are 300,000 people receiving AS out of 1,600,000 residences in New Zealand is more than revealing. 20% of the total NZ residential housing stock is rented by renters who receive AS. That is sad.

 

I dont think BD is in that end of the market somehow

Up
0

double post

Up
0

These LVRs need to be applied regionally only, they are far too harsh for those in provincial areas. Time to rid the country of foreign speculators and landlords, make life a LOT tougher for landlords so that running a business using public money (accomoodation supplements) and domestic interest rates is no longer so attractive, maybe house prices will then start to reflect what they are really worth in NZ with NZ money by NZ purchasers.

The way it is is just tearing society down in general in order to feather the nests of the few and the rentier class. Change cannot come quick enough

Up
0