
Former finance minister Bill English says there would be little point in expanding New Zealand’s capital gains tax as the era of fast house price growth has ended.
During an NZ Initiative webinar on Kāinga Ora, English revealed he had “seriously considered” a capital gains tax as part of National’s 2010 reforms but it didn’t find favour with his colleagues.
“I think every finance minister has a look at it, and they seem to come up with the same answer. In fact, Michael Cullen told me that at the time, he said, I'd go through it and then IRD will tell me that it's actually not that worth it,” he said.
“So no, there was no constituency for it in the cabinet, that's for sure”.
In 2010, the National Government raised GST from 12.5% to 15% and cut personal and company income tax rates, including lowering the top rate from 38% to 33%. The package was designed to be broadly revenue-neutral, with higher benefits and tax credits to offset the GST rise.
The Labour Party is preparing to announce a tax policy before the end of the year, which some have speculated will be a minor expansion of capital gains tax aimed at property investors. However, it could be a wealth tax or something else entirely.
English said there would be little point in taxes targeting property today as house price growth had slowed and was unlikely to resume the steady increase from the early 1990s until the pandemic peak in 2021.
“I now think capital gains tax is not quite irrelevant, but it would be a complexity that doesn't collect much revenue because the days of guaranteed capital gains in the housing market are over,” he said.
Investors will now have to be much smarter at adding value by choosing quality houses in good locations that provide for the right part of the market. They cannot just expect any given house to significantly increase in value over time.
He gave an example of a conversation he’d had with an owner who hadn’t been able to sell his property. Sales were happening in the first-home buyer market and on the high-end market, where cashed up buyers aren’t going into retirement villages.
But there was nothing happening and no interest in the mid-market, which in this case was somewhere between $1 million and $1.5 million, English said.
“And they were scratching their head, asking, Okay, so what's actually going to happen with this? Is it automatically going to go up in value? To which I said, Well, I don't think so. You might have to rent it out, and that's one reason rents are going down in some of our urban areas”.
NZ’s biggest land banker
The webinar was to discuss NZ Initiative's new report which argues Kāinga Ora had over-extended itself trying to own, develop, and manage social housing nationwide. It recommended selling more state-homes to community providers and freeing up undeveloped land for the private sector to build on.
English said Kāinga Ora was the “largest and worst” land banker in the country with more land underutilised than any other entity.
“If you want to build a new supermarket in any urban area in New Zealand, there is one owner who's got enough land for you to do it, and that's Kāinga Ora,” he said.
English said New Zealand would soon start to see the benefits of government reforms to make it easier and cheaper to build homes. This included relaxed restrictions on which building products could be imported and “radical zoning decisions”.
“It’s not all perfect, but at least the large political parties are behind it. So I think there's a sort of semi-bipartisan support that no one's promising to unwind it.”
Younger people might start to see owning housing as affordable again, the government would benefit through less fiscal exposure to the property market, which costs the Crown $4 billion a year in housing costs.
Having large amounts of property on the balance sheet also exposed taxpayers to falls in market value, with many housing assets yet to be re-valued after the pandemic crash. Which would have a significant impact on the government's net worth soon.
“So, the zoning thing works politically, it works for the economy, and it works for the government's books,” he said.
“And if they could combine that with freeing up the latent value, all this under-utilised and land-banked land in every single urban community [it could have] a significant positive impact on the economy and, more importantly, on households' ability to service their housing costs.”
21 Comments
To which I said, Well, I don't think so
Words which English might rue... You just have to look across the Tasman for an answer to the question
I like the point about KO land holdings
"Edited"
There will be a lot of exploding zombies if property flatlines (or worse).... and not just taxpayers (unless Bill is advocating tax payers foot the bill yet again)...which given its an NZI address he probably is.
English said there would be little point in taxes targeting property today as house price growth had slowed and was unlikely to resume the steady increase from the early 1990s until the pandemic peak in 2021.
Nek minut....
Regular land tax solves all issues. Price independant and regular and unavoidable.
Unless you are retired. Save up all your life to own your home for retirement, then have to sell it and get a rental because the land tax costs too much.
Many councils offer rates postponement with the debt accruing to the house, perhaps we could do similar here. Means less inheritance for the kids of course, but for me that's just a small step towards an equal opportunity society.
Yes, an annual land tax must allow postponement of all payment (with cpi-indexed interest accruing) till title transfer. Tough luck for the kids, but they didn't earn it.
Yet the oldies complain constantly about rates, so I can't see them being happy with a land tax on top. Especially if it is significant enough to make a difference to house prices and reduce PAYE.
So I agree land tax could be a great option, but its politically impossible.
So, that would be rates then.
Which "issues" are you attempting to solve?
Rates are local body tax. Land tax is central govt and would address the over investment and speculation in housing. And allow reduction in income tax.
But hay, punishing working and rewarding tax avoiding speculation make some much sence. Especially with less working (more retired) thus driving more workers to exit stage west. Making that math worse.
The issue that property investors pay almost no tax while hard working people pay lots I guess.
The days of guaranteed capital gains in real estate are over
Replaced by the guaranteed gain in Gold and Silver ?
With population peaking early 2040, and births 25% below replacement, the housing party is over without society changing immigration levels.
“Natural increase is no longer the main driver of New Zealand’s population growth. ...With no migrant arrivals or migrant departures, New Zealand’s population is projected to peak at just under 5.5 million in the early 2040s then slowly decline as deaths outnumber births.”
I am pleased to see the reduced immigration
Two immigrants for every baby born must have been some kind of record. Shows how bereft of ideas politicians are - pushing unmandated society changing policies on the demos just to keep their GDP numbers ticking.
One possible advantage of introducing a comprehensive capital gains tax would be to ENSURE the property speculation ponzi stays dead.
...because that's worked so well in Australia...oh, wait...
Agreed. Your point nively highlights why an unavoidable land tax is necessary dosent it.
Where is the debate about governments controlling expenditure ( living within there means ) just like all of us as individuals ?
Finding ways to increase taxation is just too easy for some financial illiterate governments
Relying on Ponzinomics to create national wealth was never a good idea to start with. The problem with English is that he wants to explain the tinkering, but doesn't want to deconstruct why he never seriously wanted to do anything about it.
Surely now is the time to introduce such a tax when people will be least concerned with one.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.