sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Reliance on housing being the sole source of wealth is changing and will continue to change, Reserve Bank Assistant Governor Karen Silk says

Property / news
Reliance on housing being the sole source of wealth is changing and will continue to change, Reserve Bank Assistant Governor Karen Silk says
A composite image of a pattern of wallets with money overlayed with a sold sign and two hands holding model houses.
A composite image of a pattern of wallets with money overlayed with a sold sign and two hands holding model houses. Composite image source: 123rf.com and interest.co.nz

Reserve Bank Assistant Governor Karen Silk says the reliance on housing being the sole source of wealth is changing - and will continue to change as the world shifts.

Last week, the Reserve Bank’s (RBNZ) Monetary Policy Committee reached consensus on raising the Official Cash Rate (OCR) by 25 basis points to 2.50% from 2.25%. Since then, some banks have increased their floating rates and savings rates

Speaking to Interest.co.nz on Monday, RBNZ Assistant Governor Karen Silk said "where the OCR has the greatest impact is in that short end ... up to 12 months, 18 months, kind of impact ... [It's] not surprising that you see some of that jump a little, and that would have some flow-on impact potentially into mortgage rates at that end".

“The longer end wholesale rates had moved down quite substantially," she said, and there already had been an increase in the two-, three-, four-, five-year mortgage rates a few months back.

"The margin has widened on those," Silk said. "There was no real imperative there for the banks to increase those longer-dated mortgage rates. but obviously the outlook from here really depends on what is going to happen globally as well as domestically.”

'Reliance on housing as your source of wealth will change'

Asked about discussions on interest rates and whether they could sometimes be too focused on housing, Silk said: "That's a reflection, I think, of New Zealanders' long-standing position of 'I create wealth through owning my house or buying more houses'." 

Silk said housing had become almost a substitute wealth channel and so the focus on mortgage rates had also become a big thing.

“What we need to be thinking about is how does that investment broaden and move away from it just being a housing story into something that is much more productive, which allows the economy to continue to grow. And as that grows, that means that incomes can grow, more people are employed," she said.

If there isn’t that broader story when it comes to interest rate movements and the focus was just on housing, Silk said: “Interest rates can almost exaggerate parts of the cycle but if you can extend that into a much more productive economy, and people are investing in a productive economy, then that takes away all of that cyclical aspect that is sitting there.”

But just having a higher interest rate wasn’t going to solve these issues, Silk said, and there were real reasons why house prices have increased over the long term, which in part reflected undersupply. 

“A lot of work has been done over the last few years in terms of changing the conditions to improve levels of supply of new housing in the market, and so that means that demand and supply, the disconnect between the two, is starting to close … That reliance on housing as your source of wealth will change.” 

Silk said we’re in a bit of a changing world and used other economies as an example. 

"If you think about some of the things that have happened in other economies where you've had more focus on building that longer-term investment profile. The level of financial literacy goes up and the flow-on impact into a more productive economy ... There's evidence that is there," she said.

“The reliance on housing being the sole source of wealth is changing and will continue to change.” 

The lesser of two evils

Following the OCR increase, BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis said people understandably think rising interest rates are bad. 

“They think about it in terms of having to pay more on their mortgages and the fact that tends to slow housing markets down, and the like, but I think we get over consumed with housing market-associated news.”

Toplis said: “If you stand back from all of this, and say, ‘what is the thing that has hurt New Zealanders most over the last five years?’ I don't think interest rates would be the one that pokes up to mind. I think it’s inflation.”

“We should be learning from that. Rising interest rates do hurt people; no one's pretending otherwise, but it can be the lesser of two evils, and to me that message hasn't sunk in.”

For Silk, inflation is a shocking thing.

“High levels of inflation does reduce your purchasing power," she said.

"When you’ve got a high inflation scenario, you can buy less and less for the same dollar and that constrains demand. It reduces activity in the economy. It is an incredibly negative thing from that perspective.”

She said moving interest rates around was about trying to get stability back into pricing.

Having that type of stability meant wages could keep pace with changing prices, there’s certainty for businesses and you see investment start to happen, she said, and this led to the job growth cycle improving. 

If there was price volatility or prices continued to get higher and higher, you’d see demand fall out of the economy and as a consequence you wouldn’t get growth and long-term investment, Silk said, which was a "bad position for an economy to be in". 

“The best thing you can have is a stable price environment because then people understand what they can purchase for every dollar spent.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

19 Comments

Oh the humanity. Finally the spotlight is on how one half of NZ has been exploiting the other simply because of access to bank debt. Also saw that TOP is at 4.7% in the latest poll.

Popcorn.

Up
4

Humanity is not stealing familys lifetime of work saving for their personal assets to give to people who can't be bothered getting of the couch.

Up
3

Really...? I think you will find the vast majority of those are in a State owned house, not via private landlord. 

Up
2

Averageman I find a contradiction in your postings - on the one hand you regularly claim investors are doomed negatively geared with falling house prices and on the other hand here they are exploiting or profiting from renters. 

The only plausible reason would seem to be envy. 😀

Up
4

And hes back. Did they just let you out of jail/ban or something?

Up
4

So no rebuttal that you are inconsistent in your posts . . .  and, no son, you are wrong yet again, I’ve been here all the time.

Cheers 😀

Up
2

Yawn. No one cares about personal comments. Anything constructive to add....?

edit - that a clear no.

Up
0

Humanity is not stealing familys lifetime of work saving for their personal assets to give to people who can't be bothered getting of the couch.

However property investment is, in effect, taking someone else's savings/earnings/work to pay off your own asset. It could be argued that historically property investment is gaining outlandish capital gains for doing absolutely nothing, much like the analogy of those on the couch for which you refer.

Up
5

Exactly. The speculative are blinded by their greed goggles.

Up
4

Averageman; 

To paraphrase Robert Duvall, "I love the smell of envy comments in the morning... it smells like victory." Is that right?

Cheers

Up
1

It does amuse me that the likes of yourself, when presented with thew overarching macroeconomic issue that is renteirism, perceives those against it in any form to be envious, when in fact they simply want more to prosper than just the few who adhere to mass-renteirism.

It also unveils the psychological complex that one must feel that they have more than others so people must be envious to explain their distaste, as they cannot comprehend any other rational explanation from their viewpoint. Revealing indeed.

Up
1

https://www.stuff.co.nz/home-property/361005572/biggest-forces-behind-n…

No mention of 1 significant force: decades of failed govt policies resulting in massive devaluation of the medium of exchange 

Up
0

That isn't failed govt policy, it is baked into the fiat system. A feature, if you will. 

Up
3

“What we need to be thinking about is how does that investment broaden and move away from it just being a housing story into something that is much more productive, which allows the economy to continue to grow. And as that grows, that means that incomes can grow, more people are employed," she said.

Sniveling political virtue signaling from their education in last centurys academia Econ 101. It's quite clear for decades now that no  significant share of productivity improvements gets near the mass of people & that RBNZ is wilfully complicit in ensuring that outcome via their adherence to discredited economic theory eg NAIRU.  cf. AI

The only "trickle down" result evident is the majority of people being p***** on from above.

Up
0

If you don't want the housing market to take off again, why did you drop rates to 2.25% and leave it there for so long? 

Up
4

In a word... incompetence.

Up
4

When your economy is a one trick pony you have to whip the dead horse....   it didn't work compared with 0.25  OCR though....

The trouble with bubble economy is you need a bag holder to sell to, or as SpaceX found and IPO buyer.

FHBers are sick of buying the "next bottom", only to wake up 10% down.

the 2.25% has failed to re ignite prices.  Its a lost decade we re only 5 years in.

Up
4

The best course of action would be for the RBNZ to say nothing and keep us guessing that they know what they doing. This commentary removes the doubt.

Up
1

The RBNZ game is all about manipulating expectations as best as possible to prevent surprise and shock decisions in the market. Consistency is key, while shocks lead to a chain of decisions, price changes etc that impact the economy. 

Up
0