sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

BNZ chief economist sees higher house prices, more people in employment, good wage rises, and stronger company profits

Property
BNZ chief economist sees higher house prices, more people in employment, good wage rises, and stronger company profits
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/">Image sourced from Shutterstock.com</a>

Higher house prices, more people in employment, good wage rises, and stronger company profits could all be on the menu for 2014, according to BNZ chief economist Tony Alexander.

In his last "Weekly Overview" for the year, Alexander has done some crystal ball gazing and offered some advice for the year ahead.

In regard to house prices, he said "the chances are" that they will rise in response to accelerating population growth running up against resource constraints  and therefore limiting the "supply response" - IE how many new houses can be built.

"Investors and first home buyers will look to purchase outside of Christchurch and Auckland and an aging population will start to sell in Auckland to retire with spare dosh elsewhere."

Alexander thought, however it would "take a few months" for first home buyers to re-engage with the market following the LVR rule imposition. Latest Real Estate Institute figures showed the house sales volumes were down 6.6% in November compared with a year ago, with a big drop-off of sales among lower priced houses - which suggests a big drop-off in the number of first home buyers.

In more general terms, Alexander said BNZ economists saw a number of reasons to be optimistic about the environment in the year ahead.

"The big no-brainer is the rebuilding of Christchurch, which, when combined with the lift in house building in Auckland, rising infrastructure spending, investment in dairy conversions, irrigation, and processing, plus earthquake strengthening and water-tightening will bring a boom for the construction sector, engineering and the great number of industries associated with them," he said.

This would boost employment for a lot of people and place strains on materials prices and contractors’ rates.

Alexander said there was likely to be some catch-up inventory building and business capacity-building of a general nature plus catch-up spending by consumers after some years of restraint. Some anticipation of tax cuts may set in also as the government’s accounts continued to surprise on the good side.

"But because we start this surge in growth toward and probably above 4% with few spare resources the rise in inflationary pressures will eventually cause the tightening part of the monetary policy cycle to kick in.

"You should anticipate rising interest rates through 2014 and 2015 but not have high expectations that we will closely pick the pace of rate rises or the peak," he said.

"The world is experiencing the biggest period of monetary policy experimentation in its history and we cannot know at what speed policy will be tightened in the United States, Australia and the UK and potentially further loosened in the EU and Japan.

'Concentrate on interest rate risk management'

"You should concentrate on adopting an interest rate risk management strategy which protects you against rate shocks rather than trying to minimise your borrowing costs by adhering to a particular view of what rates will do."

Alexander said that in the coming year wages growth would accelerate "and that will be an extremely positive thing not so much in terms of higher incomes for people but in terms of inefficient businesses closing down and labour resources being reallocated to higher-paying more productive activities".

He said with the country’s terms of trade at their highest levels since 1973 and with NZ monetary policy set to tighten, the chances are the Kiwi dollar will "oscillate generally upward", though again the unpredictable monetary policy developments offshore meant that "one would be foolish" to place too much reliance upon any set of forecasts of where the NZD will be in a year’s time.

"Personally I feel that at rates above 90 Aussie cents it is a good time to ship long term money into Aussie dollars. The same for rates above 85 US cents and especially 90 should we reach that. The same goes for levels of the NZD above 53 pence. I have no view on the NZD against the Japanese Yen but see upside potential against the Euro given the deeply entrenched problems affecting that part of the world for many years to come."

Plenty can go wrong

In terms of what might go wrong next year, Alexander said there was "lots offshore" that could go awry.

"Japan’s growth rate has slowed after an initial surge above 4%. If economic reforms are not strongly enacted the Bank of Japan’s attempts to beat deflation by printing money (how desperate do you have to be?) may fail and the Japanese economy slip back to minimal growth with a shrinking population, collapsing public finances, and expensive infrastructure bringing high maintenance costs.

"Then again the economy may surge ahead driven by a popular desire to be strong against China."

China’s growth rate will probably slow a bit further in the coming year, Alexander said.

"And as the proportion of our export revenue coming from China rises we will become, like Australia, more and more influenced by what happens not just in China’s economy but its society and politics. We will become more and more vulnerable to what seems an inevitable eventual clash between China and Japan in the East China Sea, and perhaps clash by China with other parties in the South China Sea. China claims the lot essentially, other countries including the United States have other ideas."

US 'not good'

As for other countries, Alexander said the US fiscal situation is "not good" but another Federal shut-down is now unlikely and the President has some ability to unilaterally raise the debt ceiling now.

The UK is going to spend 2014 grappling with how to keep growth going without the housing market entering a new bubble.

Australia is grappling with a costly production base causing companies in the resources and manufacturing sectors to invest elsewhere.

"There is very high uncertainty regarding which way the Aussie dollar will go next year. But with the construction sector picking up quite strongly it is likely that retailing will eventually, probably much belatedly, follow, and as long as China’s growth holds up, an acceleration in Aussie growth over the second half of the year is possible, bringing tightening monetary policy from the RBA and then perhaps fresh appreciation of the AUD."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

16 Comments

Fantastic job by the National govn, all achieved while reducing govn spending and on track for a surplus. 

 

Is John Key the greatest NZ PM ever... 

Up
0

Amazing really, what a Man!

I mean; an earthquake, single handedly rising global dairy prices and engineering a housing shortage. A genuine living God.

Up
0

And the louder the left complain the better you know he’s doing, in your own way KiwiDave you’ve paid him the ultimate compliment.  

Up
0

You missed canceling climate change and letting us mine out NZ just for his generation's pockets. He's higher than god, we are truely blessed...

I'll run down to the Beehive immediately!!!

grovel....grovel...

Up
0

And sarcasm from the ultra far left radicals; now we can confirm he's the best ever. 

 

steven is however a paid Labour party supporter so he cant' really say anything other than Labour dogma. 

Up
0

Unfounded and libelious I believe.

regards

Up
0

Steven - I've always wondered about what's behind the thinking of people who make this statement of yours ..what generation is allowed to start mining to "fill their pockets"?

If you're a greenie then clearly the answer is no one ever, but if you're not, love to know the answer to that question, or is it just a political statement ?

Up
0

Grant it was meant to be a light hearted thing.

Im not sire otherwise what you are asking.

But I will try, first sustainable, by defination that is taking no more from the planet than is coming from the sun in what ever form eg PV panels, growing food, using windmills, organic agriculture.

So oil is hundreds of millions of years of fossils and we will use that up in 150years.  In fact we have used 1/2 in 100 years and at the rate we are going the BBs from the time of their birth to their death (about 80 years) will in effect have used up most of it.

That is simply a statement of fact.

As another example UK, coal production peaked in 1913, Im not aware today there is even one coal mine left, its used up. This is the same problem with oil.

Start mining to fill their pockets and allowed to fill their pockets is a bit of a huh? Its not "allowed' its has been done.  Now the Q has to be asked if you care about future generations is it morally OK to use up the rump of a mineral in 1 or 2 generations? and wastefully?

How would you feel if say peak oil was 50 years earlier and zero oil also?  eg peak in 1950 all gone by 2000?

You would be impressed with your parents generation?

Bet you wouldnt.

regards

Up
0

Light hearted is good - it's was a genuinely curious question and now I see it's peak oil related. We may not agree on everything Steven but I'm with you on that one and I had regularly included  it in presentations that I made back prior to the GFC. Peak oil is undeniable mathatically and in fact we're well past peak conventional already. Deep sea oil, shale oil,  oil sands, horizontal drilling and fracking have all since ensured that peak oil in itself is still probably well down the track, but it's time will come, it's finite.

That said, the world will adapt and survive peak oil when it occurs as there are other energy sources (uranium and nuclear will not be an issue to the public when the lights go out) , plus there are other cleaner  nuclear options, not to mention energy types not yet invented. Peak  oil to me was always a timing issue, when it does actually occur and how quickly would the world adapt to the change - slow could mean very high energy prices and lifestyle changes, and that was the timing risk.

In the interim, I for one am all for having a good look to see if we've got plenty, use it and get NZ living  standards up if we have. We may not have a the resources and life changing opportunities for NZers like Norway, but I'm all for finding out if there's at least a chance.

Up
0

I dont agree on peak oil being down the track on a main point of EROEI.  So the techniques to get useable oil feedstock out of shale and tar sands mean the energy inpu is horrendious.  The resulting EROEI is 3 to 1, way below what our economy functions on which is 8~10 to 1.

Interesting thing on horizonatl drilling, its being done now and its probably gettiing some % points more oil but what it clearly does do is deplete the field faster.

When the lights go out, that of course is a big part of the problem ie time and scale.  So to build nuclear plants does I think take 8 years, so given oil output is 95% certin to decline this decade we need a huge programme now.  Robert Hirsch said it very well in 2005, we needed to start this program on the sacle of WW2 10 if not 20 years before the event, and we are 10 years after it already.

Big lifestyle changes, yes, NZ is hugely lucky in that respect as we have so much hydro.

Its going to be a big change, for instance look at milk products, Fontera insists we as NZers pay international prices yet we have low wages by the stds of many OECDs....how does that translate into oil purchasing power? How does that impact our poor?

Take a comment by PhilB on Birmingham and liverpool, parts of both are ghettos, ppl tehre survive on "WINZ" when food costs rocket and maybe WINZ payments falter how ugly could that get?

Take tahgt nationwide, ie Pakistan is a basket case and has nukes, that frightens me.....huge impact hopefully very small risk. Its state is really caused by over-population with no real output to buy oil...

NZ, on the plus side we do have an agricultural output, but its oil intensive.  Yesterday for instance I spent the morning doing a working bee clearing our range, we used 3 tractors, chainsaws etc....now we did it in maybe 4 hours, by hand maybe 4 days.

Interesting how standing aside for a moment makes you think about what you are doing and using.

Politics, franky I think JK and co is pretty bad (knee capping the RMA for instance), but I dont think for a moment Cunliffe and co is significantly better.  Both in effect want to grow still just the "benefits" go to different socio-economic groups.  So we have a pie and a shrinking one, all the above two differ in is really who gets which slice....Both are in wanton denial on that, PDK has told some of Labour's senior ppl I believe and its not listened to.  Listening to Brownless and his replacement on things energy shows they know IMHO....

The greens have also I think sold out, their recent internal spat shows their primary concern is growing voter share which they have done by taking left wingers off Labour.  Frankly talking to these nut jobs worries me. ie their expectations are pretty....demanding. Now some of it I can see as not un-reasonable, but I cant see how its met.

Not-an-economist pointed out the UN charter, everyone has the right to a home and food, great ideal, but nature doesnt grant that, a society tries to.

regards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Up
0

"more people in employment, good wage rises, and stronger company profits"

 

Says it all. 

Up
0

Don't forget:

 

"higher house prices"

Up
0

While the victims multiple.

 

Aucklanders are queuing for up to seven hours for food parcels from the City Mission, as donations run thin. Read more

 

Confirmation came this week that most of those living in poverty are in work, families with one or even two earners who are nevertheless struggling because their jobs are part-time and low paid. (Lipton's onstage persona says he has a "permanent part-time" job: "That means I'm there for most of the work and few of the benefits.") Read more

Up
0

Well 2014 is shaping up to be a fantastic year. I have been struggling but a new job with more money and a fixed mortgage coming out in June that has been at 8.6% will mean it's all roses and all the the hard work of the last 10 years will finally pay off. I hope that Key gets another term, after that it doesn't matter if those other clowns get a turn.

Up
0
Up
0

Yes.

KiwiSaver: Last but not least is KiwiSaver, which is giving us a pool of private permanent funds that can be partially invested in the domestic productive sector. KiwiSaver ought to have the same positive effect on the domestic economy as Australia's compulsory superannuation has had on its economy.

 

Good luck with that .

 

As DC noted this morning.

 

The Abbott government has abandoned its target of returning the budget to surplus in four years, blaming the “profligacy” of its Labor predecessor. Read more

Up
0