Okay, so when were you expecting the next migration-fuelled housing boom?
I had pencilled in a three-to-five year timeline. That would give the green-light migration policies of an assumed National-led government enough time to have serious traction and get our infrastructure groaning again.
But of course then we've had Labour's recent inclination to do everything National would do before National can do it and this has seen the screeching U-turn on the migration 'reset' from Labour last year, which I discussed in a recent column.
Notwithstanding policy flipflops and the like, the speed with which migration has become an issue following the pandemic has been a most startling surprise.
Not much more than a year ago as the doors to our borders were creaking open, economists were suggesting that the initial impact could be quite a sizeable net outflow of people from this country. I've got to say, I thought that seemed a reasonable enough conclusion at the time.
But fast forward to now and we've got Stats NZ provisionally estimating that there was a net inflow of 52,000 migrants for the 12 months to February (versus a net outflow of nearly 20,000 for the same period to February 2022), while the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE), said a record number of people - in excess of 20,000 - arrived in NZ on work visas in March this year. Yes, that's just March, one month.
In ANZ's recent Property Focus publication, chief economist Sharon Zollner, senior economist Miles Workman and senior strategist David Croy noted the surge of net migration in recent months, which they say "if sustained at recent levels could end up leading to materially stronger activity and housing outcomes than we currently expect".
They went on to say this:
"Our working assumption is that after pent-up demand dynamics have played out, net migration will settle at an annual net inflow of around 40k in 2023. But if the February pace was maintained for a year, we’d be looking at an annual inflow of 140k by this time next year, so the risks look skewed strongly to the upside!"
They say that a forecast ‘miss’ of this size could be significant enough to keep the economy out of recession, "and it would certainly have implications for the housing market – both house prices and rental markets".
The economists estimate New Zealand's pre-pandemic housing deficit (around 75,000 houses) "had been almost fully eroded" [IE, got rid of] as at the September quarter, 2022, reflecting "gangbusters construction activity" over the prior two-and-a-half years and slower population growth following closed borders.
Come the December quarter 2022, however and high migration alongside moderating consents saw New Zealand record its first quarterly deficit in net housing supply since closing the border.
"And while this was a relatively small deficit (around 1600 dwellings), the Q1 read is not going to be pretty," the ANZ economists say.
"And if net migration proves persistent at higher levels than we assume, we could easily be looking at a housing deficit of 20-30k by this time next year."
Right, if I can pick it up again from there, so, okay the ANZ economists are not as such actually forecasting a shortfall of houses of 30,000 by this time next year (not yet, anyway!), but their analysis shows how easy it might be for that to happen if things carry on as they are.
Already we find ourselves in a situation where the levels of migration we are now seeing could start to have game-changing impacts on the New Zealand economy.
Now there has been a bit of publicity around the migration issue in recent days - as I dare say there should be, because let's face it this is an issue that has re-mushroomed very quickly.
But I don't sense there's any urgency as yet - though there should be - to say, hey what are we going to do about this and don't you think we are going to have a very big problem is this situation is allowed to continue on for many months at all?
I won't re-litigate some of the arguments I made in my recent column, but I would suggest an urgent stock-take is done now by the government to assess the levels of people who have been coming in to the country in recent months. Have these been necessary? Do these numbers represent a one-off post-pandemic surge? (I doubt it.) What is the ongoing appetite on the part of businesses and the like to see inbound migration continuing at these current levels? What ability does the Government have - having turned on the tap - to now slow the flow of inbound arrivals?
How well co-ordinated has the opening of the borders and the allowing in of people been? I mean seriously. Is somebody somewhere putting all the numbers of applicants together and coming up with a grand total of just how many people are flowing in? Or is it piecemeal? Is there some co-ordinating presence that says, right, we'll let 20,000 workers in in March? Or did that just kind of happen? (As it certainly seemed to.)
And once those and probably other questions I haven't thought of have been addressed around the actual inbound migrant numbers, there are questions around infrastructure and simply 'making space' for additional people. We know as the ANZ economists have said above and plenty of other economists and observers have calculated that our notorious shortfall of housing has been probably just about extinguished. For now. But we know equally that this situation could change pretty quickly.
But how about other things? Last time I looked this country wasn't in great nick when it comes to things like adequate roading and just things like community infrastructure. Where is the forward planning? How is any such forward planning (and I'm not sure there is much at all) being adjusted and moderated right now for the numbers of people that have already come into the country, plus the ones likely to appear in coming months?
As I indicate at the top of this article, I didn't expect migration to be such a big issue (again) so soon. It needs to be talked about. It would be nice to know just what sorts of numbers of inbound migrants this Government, and potentially a future National Government, plan on having. If indeed 'plan' is a word we can use.
I hope this will become an election issue. Migration is something the people who already live here don't seem to ever get a say on. Finding the 'right' number of people to have in a country is undoubtedly very subjective, but my sense of this issue in New Zealand is that a lot of people and very probably a majority already think we've got too many.
Therefore I don't think it is unreasonable of us voters to be given a clear picture of what the main parties views are on inbound migration - and by which what they see as specific numbers that would be acceptable, and how they would plan for such with things like infrastructure.
Please let's not leave this to chance (again).
*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers early on Wednesday morning. See here for more details and how to subscribe.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.