UBS still anticipates the Reserve Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) will increase the Official Cash Rate (OCR) in July, with the vote potentially shifting towards a unanimous one.
The Reserve Bank (RBNZ) held the OCR at 2.25% in May, unchanged since November last year, but signalled cash rate hikes were probably on the horizon. The MPC needed RBNZ Governor Anna Breman’s casting vote to confirm the hold after the committee was tied by a 3-3 split vote on whether to raise the OCR or not.
UBS economist Stephen Wu said analysing the past three years of RBNZ meetings showed consensus or unanimous MPC decisions have become less frequent.
“There have been only four meetings where a decision was made without consensus, but three of those occurred last year,” he said.
“Moreover, in the three meetings where MPC members disagreed on the direction of the OCR, the subsequent meeting's OCR decision was unanimous and aligned with the previous minority view. With the May MPS meeting the most split, we anticipate the MPC to hike in July, and the vote could shift towards unanimous.”
UBS expects the RBNZ’s MPC members who voted for a hike in May to repeat that decision in July, with other MPC members also shifting towards a tightening mindset.
The three RBNZ MPC members – Breman, Karen Silk and Paul Conway – voted to leave the OCR on hold, while the three external members – Carl Hansen, Hayley Gourley and Prasanna Gai – voted for a 25-basis point increase.
Annual inflation came in at 3.1% in the March quarter, with electricity the largest contributor to the annual inflation rate. Economists expect it to top 4% in the June quarter.
“The case for early and pre-emptive hikes is that inflation is too high, and hence monetary stimulus needs to be removed,” Wu said.
According to Wu, New Zealand’s inflation over the past five years has averaged a “very high” average inflation rate of approximately 4.5% year-on-year. This is the highest trend since central banks moved to an inflation targeting framework in the early 1990s, he said.
“Compared with the RBNZ's target of between 1% to 3%, this outcome is very far above their mandated goals and, cumulatively since the early 1990s, is an upside error of an extremely large ~14%.”
Wu said there isn’t a lot of data being released between the May and July MPC meetings. UBS saw Budget 2026 as neutral for the RBNZ, while the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data for the first quarter of the year was “dated”.
“Meanwhile, monthly data have not been definitive. Consumption indicators have improved, fuel prices have fallen, and momentum in the labour market may be weakening. However, there is a longer-than-usual gap between the July and September meetings of 2 months,” he said.
“In our view, such a long gap heightens the risk of holding in July, if inflation expectations become de-anchored. Instead, if a hike is delivered in July, the RBNZ can become more data dependent for subsequent hikes.”
5 Comments
I was thinking the other way, if the strait remains open inflation should drop down by itself. There seems to be less case for an OCR hike now than there was at the last review.
If true to character and historical record, the RBNZ will act too late and then do too much.
You can see them now spending the 2nd half of this year, raising rates, when its no longer required, pushing the economy into a recession.
Always 6-12 months behind what needs to happen.
They say 'transitory' when they are too cowardly to act when they need to, and then they say they are 'acting decisively' when they are too late to do anything beneficial and end up doing more harm than good (e.g raising rates when inflation has already peaked, or refusing to drop them when its clear prices are falling and economy is struggling).
Agree. I thought they should have made a 0.25% hike at the last review to get ahead, but now it doesn't look necessary.
Have the internals ever voted differently to one another, or are they effectively a voting bloc? Would be keen to know
Is this what we call 'forward guidance'? I think to some extent the answer is yes.
But so obtuse there's very little to take away from it.
The "inflation expectations become de-anchored" seems to be new. Whatever it means.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.