sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Commerce Commission to provide preliminary report on competition in the banking sector by August as market study gets underway

Banking / news
Commerce Commission to provide preliminary report on competition in the banking sector by August as market study gets underway
[updated]
big four bank logos

By Rebecca Stevenson & Dan Brunskill

The Government is directing the Commerce Commission to investigate competition in the personal banking sector which has consistently earned a higher return than banks overseas.

Finance Minister Grant Robertson says it's important that New Zealanders can trust their banks. 

“The cost-of-living is top of mind for many Kiwis and we need to ensure there’s a competitive market among banks providing personal loans, mortgages, credit cards and other banking services so that people have confidence they are getting the best deal possible when doing their banking,” Robertson says. 

Four major banks make up about 85% of the mortgages and have a 90% share of total bank deposits. These banks have consistently made strong returns for the past 30 years. 

Robertson says there hasn't been an in-depth look at competition issues for some time and NZ's lagging behind Australia and the UK, which have done detailed analysis. 

Commerce Minister Duncan Webb says the market study will focus on examining barriers to new competitors entering or expanding in the market, the introduction of innovative products and services and consumers’ ability to switch between banks.

“As part of the study, the Commission will examine banks’ profitability and other financial measures to assess competition in the sector,” Webb says. 

The full study will be completed by the end of August 2024 and will determine any actions that might be needed to ensure the sector is competitive. 

However, a preliminary issues paper will be released in August this year and will describe the structure of the industry and provide early indications on the nature of competition. 

“It will set a clear signal of direction for the study and may uncover discrete issues which the Government could take steps to resolve, ahead of the final report,” Webb says. 

The Reserve Bank says large banks have been more profitable than the rest of the sector and similar sized banks in comparable economies. 

It says the difference in risk-adjusted profitability may reflect a lack of competition, but could also be down to other factors such as cost efficiencies, tax treatment, or product mix. 

The benefits of having profitable banks was apparent in the current environment, as strong banks were better able to manage economic stress and help customers. 

“Importantly, profitability allows banks to support their customers by taking a long-term view in times of stress,” the central bank says. 

Net interest margins have climbed dramatically as interest rates have risen over the past couple of years. 

Banks to 'engage constructively'

Roger Beaumont, Chief Executive of bank lobby group the New Zealand Banking Association, says the Commerce Commission probe will ease any concerns in the community about competition and innovation in the banking industry.

"Our banks are transparent, and will engage constructively with the Commerce Commission,” says Beaumont.

“We have a competitive banking sector, with 16 retail banks operating in New Zealand and easy bank switching. We are open to the opportunity to discuss the contribution banks make to support the New Zealand economy, households, and businesses."

"Switching banks is easy. Your new bank can arrange everything including transferring your funds from your old bank and setting up your recurring payments to your new accounts. This can be done within five working days, and you don’t even need to talk to your old bank," says Beaumont.

 “Our banks are highly regulated, well capitalised, and profitable. That helps makes them resilient, and with recent overseas bank failures we’ve seen why that’s important."

"We hope the Commerce Commission will look closely at the regulatory environment as part of its study," Beaumont adds.

ANZ Bank New Zealand Chief Executive Antonia Watson says a competition study is "a good opportunity to provide facts in what can be a complex area". She says the bank hopes the study improves the confidence New Zealanders have in the banking sector, and ANZ was committed to contributing to the market study in a proactive and transparent manner.

“New Zealand has a highly competitive banking sector with banks of all sizes and ownership structures, including a government-owned bank. However, with cost-of-living pressures rising, it is understandable that reviews such as this take place.”

Mark Wilkshire, Chief Executive of The Co-operative Bank, says it supports competition within the NZ banking industry because of the potential for increased competition to create a better deal for customers.

'Cynical'

Andrew Bayly, the National Party’s commerce spokesperson, says it's cynical to launch a market study just before an election and after blocking a parliamentary inquiry.

“Everyone wanted to do it expect for Labour, and now they want to make it so close to the election but the results won’t be available until after the election, it looks like a bit of a stunt,” he says.

National leader Christopher Luxon says a select committee process would have been a quicker way to assess competition issues and follow up with a market study, if needed. 

“We want to ask the questions, that’s why Nicola [Willis] and I were talking about that several months ago and we could have got that in a select committee,” Luxon says. 

Willis, the party’s deputy leader, says previous Commerce Commission probes hadn’t delivered much for New Zealanders. 

“Something’s better than nothing. We welcome this as a belated step forward, we would’ve liked to see action earlier and more wide-ranging,” she says. 

HSBC's recent decision to end retail banking raised questions about regulation as well as competition. 

“There are things about the New Zealand operating environment that could be adding costs to New Zealand bank users”. 

One example is the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act regulations which have increased costs for consumers and made it harder for low income New Zealanders to access credit, National says.

'Act now'

The Green Party is welcoming news of the market study, but urging the Government to act now and raise the corporate tax rate.

“Banks have made eye watering record profits recently due entirely to circumstances out of their control, while low income people in Aotearoa spend more and more of their income on essentials. A market study will be useful, but the time is now to lift every single family out of poverty through our Income Guarantee and to pay for it with a fairer tax system,” says the Green Party’s finance spokesperson Julie Anne Genter.

“The Green Party has been pushing for an inquiry into bank profits for almost two years and we’re pleased the Government is finally taking action. However, it should not take an inquiry to realise that we have thousands of people struggling to cover the basics, while huge banks are able to line the back pockets of their wealthy shareholders."

“Our Ending Poverty Together plan would redesign the tax system, including increasing the corporate tax rate back to what it was over 10 years ago," says Genter.

Strong profits

New Zealand's banks' combined annual profit surged by more than $1 billion between October 2021 and September 2022 as margins rose, topping $7 billion for the first time, according to KPMG's annual Financial Institutions Performance Survey released in March. 

Of the 20 banks included in the KPMG banking report, 16 recorded an increase in profit.

The report also showed ANZ NZ, ASB, BNZ and Westpac NZ dominate banking in New Zealand, with a combined market share of 90.05%.

A union for bank staff said in March it supported a probe into bank profits.

First Union researcher and policy analyst Edward Miller said that a decade’s worth of data from the World Bank showed New Zealand banks’ returns on equity were among the highest of comparable countries.

The union said there should be a 5% levy on bank profits. 

 How much is too much?

The Commerce Commission has completed three market studies initiated by the minister looking into how markets were operating for residential building supplies, supermarkets and retail fuel.

A key battleground in the supermarket study was about return on average capital employed (ROACE), or how much a business earns compared with how much money has been invested in it, and the value of the assets used to generate returns.

This calculation was also used in the fuel study, and was one of three profitability measures the regulator relied on in determining the grocery market was not working well. The commission found "the major grocery retailers achieved higher levels of profitability than we would expect in a workably competitive market".

The final Commerce Commission report estimated the major grocery retailers earned ROACE of 12.8% for Foodstuffs South Island, 12.7% for Woolworths NZ, and 13.1% for Foodstuffs North Island, averaged across 2015 to 2019.

The Commission said these returns were well above its estimate of a normal return for grocery retailing in New Zealand of 5.5%.

Drafts of the report had estimated ROACE of between 21.6% and 23.8%. 

For the banks, the conversation about return on equity (ROE), or the return shareholders get compared with profitability, has already begun.

Author of the KPMG report, John Kensington, told media after backlash to bank profits that the New Zealand banking sector had a ROE of 13.4%. He said bank profits were reasonable when compared with the return on equity of other large New Zealand companies.

In 2022, BNZ had an ROE of 13.5%, Westpac 12.66%​, ANZ 14.79%​, and ASB 15.16%​.

The Australian parent companies have lower ROEs;  ANZ Australia reported 10.4%​, Westpac 7.5%​, NAB (which owns BNZ) reported a return on equity of 11.7%​ and ASB’s owner Commonwealth Bank was 12.7%​, for 2022.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

41 Comments

Yes that's right..Yet another multi million dollar probe..there is no end to this,

Up
16

This enquiry is late and wreaks of desperate electioneering. 

Up
9

It's also crap electioneering. Surely the pool of punters dumb enough to fall for this trick must be shrinking by the day? 

Up
5

Post this enquiry, nothing will change. If any Government/RBNZ Governor of the day had the balls to stare down the big four, this enquiry would not even be necessary.  

Up
11

Pretty much. Why even bother with this waste of time and energy (oh that's right, there's some votes to win in a few months). It's not like the government has had a massive majority and three years with which to actually take meaningful action, or anything like that. 

Up
4

Get em.

Up
3

That probe should be poking into government spending too.

Up
9

Toothless tiger...what exactly has happened to every other investigation. This is another one of this govts attempts to appeal to optics with no tangiable results. in the meantime Foodstuffs and Progressives laugh all the way to the Aussie Banks...

Up
16

Yep, it’s all performative

Up
9

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔. 

Probe the intelligence of RBNZ and it's handlers. It's their policies which let banks make huge profits. 

Seriously we need better thinkers in this country.

Up
18

Some good thinkers among the interest dot co whanau. Jfoe. Audaxes. Te Kooti. Scratching the surface. 

Up
2

Scratching the bottom you mean.

Up
0

Fairly sure opposition called for one a while ago, then Robinson turned around and gave Orr a 5 year extension.

Up
1

Which bank will be the first, this time, to come out with the standard petulant response to a threat to market changes?

"Ok. If that's the way you Kiwi guys want it, we'll pack up our toys and go home; Look! HSBC has already done it"

Last time it was Westpac, so I guess it's someone else's turn.

Up
7

Kiwibank?

Up
0

Banks will be shaking in their boots.......not.

Up
8

They did this in Ashtraylia several years back, it took many months, cost millions, and they found multiple breaches,  offences and indiscretions. 'Dozens' of recommendations were made, though little has changed. Why it didn't extend out to their NZ subsidiaries I don't know, as I'm sure that their would have been some very dirty laundry exposed here too. 

Up
9

Sam Uffindell was working on compliance and AML back when the stench was putrid at the Aussie banks. Never heard anyone discuss this. What did he achieve? 

Up
3

Maybe need a commission to see where the xtra govt spending goes to.

Up
3

Good dosh for the consultants.

Congratulations to the ticket holders boarding this gravy train. Spin up ChatGPT4 and enjoy the view.

Up
9

Is there any way we can measure the tax dollars invested in these investigations vs the output from the end results? 

Up
4

Yet another Labour study/inquiry that will once again lead absolutely nowhere.  This is all designed to appeal to those few gullible voters who have yet to become skeptical of this never-ending Labour tactic; analysis paralysis with zero outcomes.  Still, at least it keeps a few more expensive consultants in the money.

Up
8

While I agree the bank's profits should be looked at and loathe the numbers, I can't help but think the banks are somewhat different to Supermarkets.  There's nothing stopping people from banking with a locally owned bank, it's all done online.  There's plenty of competition in the sector. 

But I cannot choose to shop at Costco while living in Wairarapa, I have Pak n Save, New World, Fresh Choice, Countdown.  50/50 split between Foodstuffs and Progressive.  

Maybe bank account number portability and the ability to seamlessly transfer automatic payments/payees etc when switching banks would be the catalyst to change.  

Up
3

4 big banks and a handful of smaller ones cannot be construed as lack of competition in a smallish economy like ours.

Such studies mostly have the same conclusion: there isn't sufficient downward pressure on business margins partly because Kiwis are gullible consumers who don't like to "shop around".

Most of us would rather have the government spend millions probing inconclusively into every market around our economy than put a little effort into making more informed choices with our money where possible.

Up
6

Lets just be up front and totally honest here, New Zealand totally screwed up when it sold all the banks to Australia.

Up
6

1. Actions of Government and RBNZ lead to explosion in house prices.

2. Banks lend on the increased cost of housing whilst retaining margins. +/- 1.5%

3. Banks make record profits but are somehow the 'bad guy' for profiteering.

Typical deflection by this Government. Be nice to see an enquiry into Gov/RBNZ policy and how it has worsened the social divide. But these f-wits would rather give priority to surgical case loads based on ethnicity.

 

Up
5

"Oh, you pay $1000/week in rent? Thank you for keeping our mortgagee solvent! Thanks for paying their mortgage, insurance and maintenance. No, you cannot have your own $500/week mortgage".

The banks have spent more than the last decade dictating who can and cannot buy - leading to the social inequity we have now - all in the name of pushing their own profits higher. They don't actually care if you can afford a mortgage - after all, as a tenant, you're already paying them via someone else. And somehow, despite capital gains, they'd rather tenants pay their deposit equivalent every year in rent (though the special muppets in parliament helped with that one too).

Strip them of the power to generate cash against residential securities, and watch the market return to normalcy.

Up
6

I'm not defending banks as I hate them with a passion but their margins stay relatively constant. The cost of mortgages is determined by the house price and interest rates. Whilst they have some impact on both variables they are the small players. The Gov and RBNZ have a much greater impact.

Direct the hate at Ardern, Robertson, Key and Clark. Under their rule the cost of housing went from 'a bit pricey' to 'ridiculous.' I'd burn Ardern first as she promised the most and delivered the least.

Up
9

Agree with your excellent comments on this article Cheetahlegs66, the thumbs up weren't enough.

Up
1

Simon Bridges and the introduction of the LVR, btw. Dunno if he was just a puppet, but watching him front the media saying it was going to help FHBs was very much an anger-inducing moment - only beaten by the way Trevor Mallard treated the protestors outside parliament.

Maybe, like India, we need a 'None of the Above' option on our voting forms come this election?

Up
1

Nothing wrong with banks, who else is going to loan you money to buy a house ? People that bought a house years ago now cannot complain, banks have made them rich. Still things were so simple years ago, all you needed to do was buy a house, have a job and pay the mortgage.

Up
0

Sadly true Ardern's govt and choices around the RBNZ lead to some of the most egregious actions to spike the housing market. Dropping the LVRs, the massive boost in capital to residential housing "businesses", (including subcontracting their own clients to some very un-consentable developments). Huge quantities of free money given out like candy based on "trust", massive multi billion dollar loans at near zero lending rates to go straight into housing speculation. Allowing massive high density developments on small parcels of land far from transport connections and hubs leading to land value spikes. If you are a housing speculator and investor you would vote Labour every time. They bring in the largest benefits for housing investors whereas it was National that instituted the insulation requirements, most of which did nothing to improve the quality of most existing housing. After all who is ripping out the gib and windows to do installation. Most properties could easily avoid the installation of insulation requirements by having inaccessible crawl spaces that would pose a hazard to tradies and unreasonable level of redevelopment on the property. Some don't even have ceiling cavities to install to either. Truly NZ housing is not worth the paper they originally used to line them with.  

Up
0

Another Study just like the petrol companies , electricity , grocery industries that will not bring prices down .

Com Com is usless just like the for ever spending government that does have a bottomless pit on the taxpayer

Up
5

They're just trolling us now.

Up
1

Finance Minister Grant Robertson says it's important that New Zealanders can trust their banks

And once again we are patronised by the government that caused this mess. They know full well the RBNZ caused this and likely had undue influence behind the scenes as well. Again they are speaking down from their lofty towers and showing the level of intelligence they think the kiwi public have.

Given that to effectively maintain order in society, the public must have faith in the law, the police and especially the government they elected to represent them. How is the faith currently sitting in the Labour government you sit with Robbo? How are those crime stats looking? 

 

Up
3

Still no deposit guarantee and Robbo wants the sheeple to trust the banks. 

Up
5

This. Even worse no official serious DTI for investors either. RBNZ and our govt could be following Halon's Razor but I sadly think it is more malice against most the NZ public on their part.

Up
0

Well they nailed the supermarkets 

Up
1

Nailed supermarkets when? nktokyo

Up
1

They gave the supermarkets more funds to buy more nails for development purposes.

Up
0

Sorry nothing to see here moving on

Up
1