sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Opinion: Here's eight reasons why funding costs aren't really hurting the big banks

Opinion: Here's eight reasons why funding costs aren't really hurting the big banks

By Gareth Vaughan

If any further evidence was needed that the much hyped funding cost rise faced by the big banks as 2012 dawned has turned into a damp squib, it was provided yesterday with confirmation of Westpac's NZ$750 million three-year bond issue.

Westpac's mammoth domestic debt issue, split into two tranches and priced at 155 basis points over the 90 day bank bill rate and the same margin over the three-year swap rate giving interest rates of about 4.30% and 4.86% respectively, may have looked on the generous side to some of the bank's competitors. And it was clearly embraced by institutional investors, given the maximum cap set on the issue of NZ$450 million was blown clean off.

But it's hard to believe New Zealand bank bosses are currently losing any sleep over fears of funding cost rises and here's eight reasons why.

1) As Westpac Treasurer Jim Reardon told interest.co.nz, the NZ$750 million is a "pretty big chunk" of what the bank needs to borrow during 2012 in order to fund its debt maturities and forecast lending growth, therefore reducing the prospects it'll need to go cap in hand to overseas wholesale lenders, potentially at a time of unfavourable market conditions.

2) ANZ last Friday raised NZ$250 million in a seven-year retail bond issue at 6.25%. That was after the bank called a separate NZ$250 million bond on March 2, that was paying 7.6%. Therefore it effectively replaced NZ$250 million of funding for 135 basis points less than it had been paying.

And there's more of this to come. Another NZ$1.32 billion worth of bank bonds are due to be called - or reset - this year. Issued in 2007 at margins over the five-year swap rate, the four issues are currently paying interest rates ranging from 8.23% to 10.04%. Given today's lower interest rate environment, if they're reset investor-lenders will start receiving interest rates hundreds of basis points lower than they're now getting, meaning the banks will be borrowing at cheaper rates. And if the banks plumb for new issues, they'll also be at lower rates.

3) Banks - and other corporates - are finding new markets from which to borrow money. ANZ recently issued covered bonds, secured by New Zealand residential mortgages, in Switzerland raising 500 million Swiss francs (about NZ$660 million) at a rate a spokesman declined to disclose. And Transpower is borrowing C$250 million (NZ$307 million) through a five-year Canadian private debt placement at 3%.

Given the interest rate environment in the likes of Europe and North America is even lower than New Zealand, and our relative economic solidity, there are plenty of investors in those countries attracted to solid looking kiwi banks and firms. Official interest rates in Switzerland are 0%, they're 1% in Canada, 0.25% in the United States and 1% in the Eurozone, compared with New Zealand's 2.5% Official Cash Rate.

4) In its Monetary Policy Statement last week the Reserve Bank noted banks pulled in NZ$7 billion more through the deposit door in 2011 than they emptied out the new lending door, thus reducing the need for banks to actively seek long-term wholesale funding at expensive levels.

Jason Wong, the Reserve Bank's head of financial markets intelligence, went as far as saying: "The banks can take all those deposits, fund any new credit growth, and actually pay off  debt when it comes up for maturity."

Now, granted the cost of converting the money borrowed overseas into the New Zealand dollar has gone up - something also highlighted by Wong - but the banks simply aren't currently raising much money in the much discussed offshore wholesale markets.

ANZ, the country's biggest bank with NZ$125.1 billion in assets including NZ$93.5 billion of net loans, has raised NZ$1.9 billion so far this year and BNZ issued a €500 million (about NZ$797 million) covered bond in January. ASB and Westpac are yet to tap overseas wholesale markets in 2012 and Kiwibank, whose euro denominated commercial paper programme was drawn down to the tune of NZ$385 million at December 31, says it's 87% funded through customer deposits.

5) Lending growth, where there is any, is  anaemic. The latest Reserve Bank sector credit data shows agricultural debt flat in the year to January at NZ$47.525 billion, business debt up 2% to NZ$74.215 billion, housing loans up 1.2% to NZ$173.375 billion and consumer debt down 0.2% to NZ$11.785 billion.

6) Term deposit rates haven't exactly been going through the roof. The average bank six month rate is up 13 basis points so far this year to 4.27%, the average one-year rate is up 8 basis points to 4.44%, with the average 90 day bank rate unchanged at 3.39%. The highest advertised rate is 6% for five years from RaboDirect and Kiwibank. See our bank averages chart at the bottom of this story. Also see all advertised bank term deposit rates from one to nine months here and all advertised bank term deposit rates for one to five years here.

7) The big banks have large stockpiles of emergency cash supply, should they be required. As of December 31, ANZ, ASB, BNZ and Westpac - between them - were sitting on liquid assets, the likes of cash, treasury bills, government securities, residential mortgage backed securities, bank bonds, and call deposits with the Reserve Bank, worth a combined NZ$41.489 billion. Chuck in Kiwibank's NZ$2.145 billion, and between them the big five had NZ$43.6 billion.

The idea is that this stock pile comprises either cash, or assets that can quickly be converted into cash, should the banks need money in a hurry if, for example, there was a sudden surge in demand from borrowers.

8) Last, but certainly not least, the European Central Bank's Long Term Refinancing Operation has seen it lend €1 trillion at 1% over three years to European banks since late December. This has calmed international financial markets, previously spooked by the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis, - at least for the time being.

Now, if the last few years have taught us anything about global financial markets it's to expect the unexpected and that there's likely to be more bad news around the corner. So later in the year the picture may change. Heck, our banks may even need to source more funding to cover a huge spike in demand from borrowers. But right now the much publicised fear of ramped up funding costs shouldn't be seeing any local bank bosses waking up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat.

Term deposit rates

Select chart tabs

(bank averages)
(bank averages)
(bank averages)
(bank averages)
(bank averages)
(bank averages)
(bank averages)
(bank averages)

This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers this morning. See here for more details and to subscribe.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

11 Comments

They say there are 16th century stones set into the ground along the north eastern side on Honshu warning future Japanese settlers of the Tsunami potential...these were ignored...no worries here...we have Tsunami walls in place..we are prepared...we have regular stress tests too...and the people are trained to respond to the alarms and loudspeaker warnings...

All of the comments above about the banks having no worries over funding etc etc......so much BS and blather.

Have this with your coffee...it's one huge red flag...

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article33596.html

Up
0

That's why they're called Runes. Cos when you ignore what they say, you end up rueing the day, the day you end up  in riun.

Up
0

Nice tangent from the actual story wolly. Did you actually read it? Or just another drive by shooting of  a comment?

Up
0

There you go wolly...it's not only Dave Chaston and I who hold this opinion about your comments.

Up
0

..... be fair to Wolly , for an hour or two I'd forgotten all about marketoracle ...... where would I be without him to jog my wayward memory !

Up
0

Nothing wrong with drive by pot shots at banks and the economic farce we are expected to believe is a well regulated system with prudent RBNZ controls....heck if that were not the case we could end up with massive debts and a permanent recession, with billions being lost in finance company fraud and with the promise of govt bailing out bank losses...depositors losing the lot and an altogther failed nation status.

Up
0

So you didn't read the story?

Up
0

Re#5

Where's the money coming from to pay the interest on the outstanding debt - govt borrowing, deposit liquidation? The growth in outstanding debt certainly doesn't match the average interest cost of that debt. 

 

This alone is a reason to lose sleep, as the government has paid down ~$1.0 bn debt for the 5 mths ending Feb '12. But Treasury still lends the banks a sizeable $6.3bn via the RBNZ. from the pre-election over funding exercise, at a rate of approximately 2.75%.  

 

Well below the average 5.45% cost of servicing the government debt. 

Up
0

Stephen.....you know better than to expose the RBNZs dirty laundry for the public to see..not that they will understand the rort...she's a great little economy for being a bank in mate...fat profits for nout...hahahahahaa

Up
0

This from Fairfax Australia today: "Banks are expected to start facing questions from customers to unwind some of their recent out-of-cycle mortgage pricing rises amid signs that the pressures driving up funding costs are easing."

http://www.businessday.com.au/business/banks-feel-heat-on-rates-2012032…

Up
0

Still, Dr Debelle knocked down suggestions from bank executives there was no direct link between the Reserve Bank's cash rates and bank mortgage rates.

The level of the cash rate set by the Reserve Bank was a ''primary determinant'' of the level of funding costs for banks, he said. Although he noted there were other drivers, including competitive pressures for deposits and a premium for risks.

 

His (Dr Debelle) comments are at odds with the apparent need of our local banks to attract savings @ 4.5%  when OCR languishes @ 2.5%.

Up
0