Improvements are likely to feature in upcoming March quarter labour market data, economists say, but it reflects economic conditions that pre-date the oil shock.
Statistics New Zealand will be releasing its labour market data for the March quarter on Wednesday, May 6. In the December quarter, NZ’s unemployment rate was 5.4%, with an increase from the September quarter’s 5.3% due to a meaningful rise in the ‘participation rate’ as more people made themselves available for work. The official number of people out of work rose 5,000 to 165,000.
At the time, economists said there were positive indicators in the details, showing the labour market was turning a corner. But things have changed a lot since then with conflict in the Middle East impacting fuel supply and causing major supply disruption in the global oil market.
In the lead up to next week's labour market data drop, Kiwibank economists Jarrod Kerr and Alexandra Turcu said; “improvements in the labour force will show up next week, but it’s old data”.
“Any improvements from here will likely be a slow, very slow, burn story. Labour market tightening takes time, and requires business sentiment to stabilise and improve,” they said.
“Any confidence building up by businesses has been slashed by skyrocketing fuel costs and supply disruptions.”
Alongside this, the labour market tends to lag the economic cycle.
ANZ and Westpac announced they’re projecting the unemployment rate to hold at 5.4% for the March quarter, while ASB and BNZ have gone for 5.5%.
The Reserve Bank, in its February Monetary Policy Statement (MPS), was projecting a 5.3% unemployment rate for the March quarter. The February MPS came out before the conflict in the Middle East began.
Economic conditions pre-dating conflict in the Middle East
Westpac senior economist Michael Gordon said; “we expect next Wednesday’s labour market surveys to show a steadying in the jobs market over the March quarter.”
“There’s a growing range of evidence that the economy was starting to find its footing again in the early part of the year, at least up until the Iran conflict.
“But with the labour market tending to lag the broader economic cycle, we should expect jobs growth and wage demands to remain muted at this stage.”
Gordon said they expected a small drop in employment and participation rates this time, “reversing a surprising jump in the previous quarter”.
The unemployment rate is the key variable to watch, Gordon said.
“We expect wage growth to continue running at about 2% annualised, reflecting the degree of slack in the jobs market and the moderation in inflation in recent years.”
Gordon said Westpac’s projections are “a little softer” than what the RBNZ expected in its February MPS, “however, the fast-moving developments in the Middle East mean that the RBNZ’s forward view on the labour market will likely have shifted since then.”
ANZ senior economist Miles Workman said the labour market data for the March quarter will largely reflect economic conditions that pre-date the oil shock.
The RBNZ did not provide an updated labour market projection at its April Monetary Policy review, Workman said, but the slow-moving nature of the labour market means its February MPS projection of 5.3% “remains within the realm of possibility.”
Middle East conflict presents ‘significant challenges’ to NZ’s labour market outlook
BNZ head of research Stephen Toplis said job ads lifted in the quarter and jobseeker numbers were stable suggesting the labour market deterioration had slowed pre-conflict.
BNZ anticipated labour force participation to lift slightly and annual wage growth to remain subdued, Toplis said.
"Employment lifted in the fourth quarter of 2025 for the first time in over a year and we expect this continued in the first quarter of 2026. However, our forecasts for improved labour supply would still see the unemployment rate tick up to 5.5%."
Toplis said there is more interest in how the employment picture evolves from the June quarter onwards.
“We have lowered our employment growth forecasts and see the unemployment rate peaking around 5.8% later this year.”
'Heightened stagflationary risks'
ASB economist Wesley Tanuvasa said the March quarter was expected to reflect a firming employment trend and strong labour supply response but headline numbers “will likely remain weak.”
“We estimate first quarter employment grew 0.1% quarter-on-quarter. However, this will be outpaced by a stronger increase in the labour force reflective of stronger net immigration. This is expected to push the unemployment rate up to 5.5%. Labour cost growth should remain modest.”
Tanuvasa said conflict in the Middle East presents significant challenges.
"The Middle East conflict presents significant challenges to the NZ labour market outlook. We do not envisage a labour market recovery unfolding until 2027 and cite heightened stagflationary risks over 2026 given higher near-term unemployment and higher near-term inflation in our projections. "
Official Cash Rate
In April, the RBNZ held the Official Cash Rate (OCR) at 2.25%. Several bank economists have brought forward their OCR hike projections - with many picking July but not ruling out the possibility of an increase in May.
ANZ’s Workman said the March quarter data is expected to show that the economy entered the oil shock “with a considerable degree of disinflationary slack in the labour market.”
“While that is by no means good news, it does limit the risk of labour costs re-emerging as a source of CPI (consumer price index) inflation pressure in the near term.”
Workman said “in turn, this should mean that when the RBNZ does begin hiking the OCR, it only needs to ‘normalise’ monetary settings rather than push interest rates into outright contractionary territory.”
“As a first pass, that would imply an OCR peak of around 3%. That said, there are plenty of scenarios in which the peak could be higher (or lower) than this.”
Westpac’s Gordon said: “The bigger issue for the RBNZ will be what has happened since the MPS: the Middle East oil shock will hinder the economic recovery, potentially leading to delays in hiring, layoffs and business failures.”
12 Comments
Hmmmm pretty nuanced article really
Which probably means some will read “temporary interruption” as boom confirmed, while others read it as Mad Max by lunchtime.
I'm in Wellington this weekend. It's a tired, run down shambles.
So many vacant shops, and closed down restaurants (including old favourites such as Aubergine in Thorndon)
The renovated library is good, but there's a big hole next to it where the council offices used to be. And most of the shops along there seem to be vacant.
I think Wellington has been even more poorly governed and managed than Auckland, and that's really saying something.
I really fear for its future, especially as there will be a big earthquake at some point.
I left Wgtn a month ago after 40+yrs. Looking back at what the last 15yrs of Green / Left leadership has done to Wellington, its easy to imagine how much good they would do to NZ...
I really fear for its future, especially as there will be a big earthquake at some point.
The Alpine Fault in New Zealand's South Island is considered
one of the world's most regular or periodic large faults
, with a major rupture occurring approximately every 250--330 years. The central section reliably produces magnitude 8 earthquakes, with the last event occurring in 1717
Wellington may not be rebuildable. Regarding empty shops, walk or drive through Takapuna or New Market, for lease signs everywhere. This recession was bad before the Iran war.
Far too many speciality shops and hospitality businesses existed. Most of them survived during the good times but cannot survive when the economy is down. A slight economic pick up will see a few return but hopefully we don't get back to boom times when any person and their dog could run a speciality shop or a hospitality business. Heaven forbid commercial landlords may have to drop their rent.
Cafes in particular - were way too many. Still are. Restaurants too. Lots of Indian restaurants that hardly ever seem to have any patrons.
In a major earthquake event the govt & associated bureaucracy would relocate, internet broadband enables that option massively.
If the public service left town, Wgtn would just be a ferry terminal.
Definitely it was bad before the war. Will only get worse, of course.
The gutting of the public service*, and the house price crash, have really, really whacked Wellington.
*Note: the bureaucracy should never have got so big in the first place. Quite obscene bloat under Labour. It was setting Wellington up for a fall, even if it boomed in the short term.
Has Auckland been badly governed recently? Improved a lot IMO. City centre is a load better, public transport is now quite usable, rates increases not bad compared to elsewhere.
The central interceptor CRL link poo pond upgrades etc. AKL has some good things coming , WGTN water is a basket case billions need spending Wayne brown doing his best to limit rate rises
Don't live in Akl but have that distinct impression WB has been good for Akl. Read about the fracas between the past CEO of Auckland Transport and WB. Checked the CV of the past CEO, Dean Kimpton. A big ego no doubt based on his previous jobs. Also a Civil Engineer and most likely resented WB coming up with suggestions that DK wouldn't implement or perhaps even discuss.
My reference point was in modern times ie. last 20-30 years. It's been bad. But I agree it's generally got better in recent years. AT is a basketcase, though.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.