sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Westpac economists see 'a better than even chance' that the RBNZ Governor will in her upcoming speech give a preliminary assessment of how the Middle East shock is impacting the RBNZ's assessment of the monetary policy outlook

Economy / news
Westpac economists see 'a better than even chance' that the RBNZ Governor will in her upcoming speech give a preliminary assessment of how the Middle East shock is impacting the RBNZ's assessment of the monetary policy outlook
percent-dicerf4.jpg
Source: 123rf.com

Economists are seeing a good chance that Reserve Bank (RBNZ) Governor Anna Breman will push back against sharp wholesale interest rate rises that currently price-in about three hikes to the Official Cash Rate this year.

Breman's speech on Tuesday laying out the RBNZ's thinking on the Middle East crisis is hotly anticipated by economists and the financial markets.

And those are financial markets that have been thoroughly upturned by the Middle East developments.

In her weekly This week in NZ Economics podcast, ANZ chief economist Sharon Zollner said that as of Monday morning "I think the market was pricing 77 basis points of hikes from the Reserve Bank this year, whereas after the February Monetary Policy Statement it was a third of that".

"I would  not interpret that as a literal reflection of what the collective wisdom of the market is," she said.

"The market is extremely illiquid, barely functional really, as global money just scarpers really, and so essentially the market pricing is more a reflection of flows going through it than of anything else and rates are gapping quite extensively," Zollner said.

What the Reserve Bank is going to do is highly uncertain, she said.

On the one hand we've had a confidence shock and economy is comin from a bad place and with spare capacity in the economy the RBNZ could "look through" the initial inflationary impacts of the crisis, confident these would not become persistent. On the other hand, we are starting from having annual inflation as of the December quarter already at 3.1% and outside the RBNZ's 1% to 3% target range. 

Zollner said there were already some signs in the ANZ Business Outlook survey of increasing pricing intentions and also to some extent higher wage setting. So, the situation is uncertain.

Therefore on the Breman speech, Zollner said the market "will be watching that very closely to see whether she pushes back against the interest rate increases that we’ve seen in the wholesale rates and tells everyone to chill out or whether she focuses rather on the potential inflation expectations and stresses that the Reserve Bank is ready to offset those by raising rates.

"So, it’s hard to sound reassuring and threatening at the same time, and, it’s going to be quite a balancing act.  Essentially,  wait and see makes perfect sense at the moment. But markets are extremely unsettled and so are going to keep reacting to every headline, whether that’s to what the Reserve Bank of New Zealand says or what Trump posts or anything else."

'Rate hikes completely unwarranted'   

Kiwibank's chief economist Jarrod Kerr and economist Sabrina Delgado in their weekly First View publication said regarding the Breman speech that "a lot hinges on the messaging around inflation and demand risks, and in light of the push higher in wholesale rates".

"Fears of inflation have markets traders pricing in three rate hikes this year.

"Rate hikes are completely unwarranted in our view. And we completely disagree with market sentiment. We see hikes as infeasible for the RBNZ, given the immense demand shock that the oil disruption brings to the Kiwi economy."

The Kiwibank economists said that taking a leaf from the number of central Banks taking the stage last week Breman was expected to acknowledge near-term inflation, but emphasise the significant downside risks to growth.

"...And in doing so, push back on wholesale rates… much like she did at the end of last year, and then again at their February MPS."

In Westpac's Weekly Commentary, senior economist Darren Gibbs said Breman "will have the opportunity to guide the market" with her speech.

"While the RBNZ’s [pre-speech] advisory states that this speech will not pre-empt the [RBNZ Monetary Policy Committee's] April Monetary Policy Review decision, at the very minimum, we expect that the Governor will lay out the framework the Bank will use to analyse the impact of the war on the New Zealand economy i.e., the main channels of influence and the short-term inflation and activity trade-offs that the MPC may need to consider when setting monetary policy," he said.

'Every chance that Breman will go further'

"We think that there is a better than even chance that the Breman will go further and give a preliminary assessment of how the shock is impacting the MPC’s assessment of the policy outlook. If she does, we think that her comments will lean against the market’s current pricing of close to three 25bps OCR hikes this year (which compares starkly with the RBNZ’s February MPS indication of just a chance of a single 25bp hike).

"We expect Breman to acknowledge that headline inflation will be higher this year than forecast in February."

Gibbs said that "as any good central banker should" he expects that the Governor will indicate that the RBNZ will be vigilant in looking for signs of any second-round impacts that might cause higher-than-target inflation to persist well into next year.

"However, crucially, we also expect Breman will argue that the New Zealand economy is operating with a large degree of spare capacity – including in the labour market – and that this 'negative output gap' makes it less likely that a temporary oil price shock will lead to persistent inflation.

"And she may indicate an expectation that this negative output gap will remain for longer than the Bank estimated in February, given that higher oil prices and the current tightening of financial conditions will weigh on both trading partner and domestic economic growth."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

20 Comments

Whatever she does will have negative consequences, either on growth or inflation. I always thought she was meant to focus on inflation, and if that's the case an OCR hike or 3 this year is totally on the cards. I doubt she'll be able to convince the market otherwise, and didn't she say she wanted a transparent RBNZ. 

Up
1

Completely agree - showed up and acted all tough like she was going to be vigilant on inflation and act when necessary. And yet when action is actually required she appears to be like a possum in the headlights.

I guess we will find out what she has to say this week.

One imagines her plan will be to try and talk wholesale interest rates lower, but its possible they don't believe her. And if that is the case, mortgage rates will keep going up and the gap between the OCR and 1-2 year rates will continue to climb.

As I was pointing out this past week or two, the last time the 1 year swap and the OCR became detached like this, inflation became embedded in the economy for years (was back in 2021 with OCR at 0.25 and swaps going up over 1%) and they had to lift the OCR up above 5%.

There is nothing stopping them from lifting rates now and then cutting again down track if the Hormuz situation sorts itself out. But if they fail to raise now, and inflation gets embedded again, then we will be stuffed again for another 24-36 months with higher rates/OCR and cost of living issues. 

The complete one sided bias to cut rates with enthusiam when deflation is possible, but to resist raising rates as much as possible when inflation is 99% probable outside their mandated band, completely baffles me. Hence my concern around corporate capture in favour of the retail banking sector. 

Up
1

Just saying....

I've seen a lot of possums in my headlights over the years and by far the majority have evaded my attempts to turn them into road pizza.

I think its the young,  inexperienced ones that learn to move just as they are expiring their last breath.....

Up
0

If she tries to jawbone the market then she is as bad as Orr with analysis and conduction of the MPC. I get hurting mortgage holders at a time of an economic low isn't pertinent to recovery, but they have no other tricks than the OCR to work with so.....

Up
2

And yet the only reason we need to 'hurt mortgage holders at a time of an economic low' is because we've spent decades lowering the OCR as we imported deflationary forces from abroad, meaning we could pay more than was reasonable for houses because mortgage rates were artificially low. ie pushed private debt way up above 100% of GDP and its stayed up there post GFC (130-160% of GDP if my memory is accurate). 

This is the problem - not that we have an oil shock. 

If our private debt was far lower (also meaning much lower house prices), then it wouldn't be an issue to raise rates.

It wouldn't be foolish now to raise rates because we have an inflationary shock, it was foolish to lend so much against the housing market - or to use the housing market as a tool to generate aggregate demand (and the wealth effect) in the economy as we imported deflation the past 3 decades. 

Up
5

"This is the problem - not that we have an oil shock. "

Beg to differ....the private debt simply accentuates the oil shock. None of it will mean anything if we lose access to (sufficient) oil before we have developed a different economy.

Up
1

This is the problem - not that we have an oil shock. 

I agree culturally it has been a poor decision for national resilience and allowing the hoarding of wealth to certain generations, however having very high oil prices impacts everything, and will for some mean choices between the likes of food or power etc. The housing issue is big, yes, but the cost of energy impacts everyone and everything. We will likely see an impact in the continuation of decreasing house prices, but this doesn't help those who can't eat.

Set your feelings aside from the housing matter for a brief moment and find the web that oil touches. It is all connected.

Up
1

My personal view is we are suffering significantly from corporate capture. RBNZ should tell retail banks to get back in their lane - instead of trying to influence market decisions for their own benefit. 

I remember Breman saying she was going to have an eagle eye (or similar term) on inflation when she stepped into the role.

After doing nothing at the last meeting when inflation was out of band and trending higher for an entire year (ie 4 consecutive quarters) and yet she decided to do nothing!

All talk it would appear without the courage to act. 

Remeber if we had a deflationary risk, instead of an inflationary risk, there would be emergency OCR cuts and the central bank would be back to QE.

And yet when we have measured inflation, outside of band, and a strong inflationary risk, its like the central bank become akin to a possum in the headlights. 

The bias is completely bizarre - almost cowardly - all in favour of making sure we can keep pumping out more private debt to retail banks. That appears to be the only reason. 

Up
4

Seems like some people are still looking at this like its 2021 again.

Back then prices were going up because everything was cranking, lotsa spending, housing going crazy and cheap moola everywhere.

Now its more about oil pushing prices up while the economy itself is already a bit soft. So yeh different situation.

Raising rates into that wont really fix much,  as it just risks slowing things down even more.

So yeh makes sense the rbnz are cautious here. I reckon they will just hold..

Up
2

You mean: you hope and pray they hold.

They are going to have to raise

 

Up
9

And raising the OCR is going to lower the price of imported oil, how exactly ?

Up
3

How did lowering interest rates the past few decades fix the deflation problem we had? It didn't, yet we persisted with it for decades - the problem was cheap foreign goods flooding the market. The response was cheaper mortgage rates, high private debt, expensive houses, and loss of trades, jobs and manufacturing/service companies in NZ (lost to cheap foreign labor in Asia)

How exactly is that different from raising rates when we import inflation instead of deflation?

You can't have it both ways. 

Up
2

That aint the same thing tho

Back then deflation was coming from cheap imports and globalisation, so cutting rates here was never going to fix that directly

Same idea now. If inflations coming from stuff like oil, hiking rates locally doesnt change the cause either.

So its not “having it both ways”, its just different drivers.

Up
0

If you know of some method the RBNZ have to stifle rising inflation, their key mandate, other than the OCR, we are all ears. 

Up
2

Ocr is the tool, just not a magic one.

Yeh it slows the economy, but it aint gonna fix oil prices.

So when inflations coming from offshore, hiking is more of a trade off than a solution. Not as simple as “they have to raise”.

Up
0

Given they have one tool to fight inflation, when inflation increases they have but one choice. I agree it is a trade off, but that doesn't change their lack of other alternatives to use, and as their mandate is to control inflation, I feel their actions will be predictable.

Up
0

Strawman

Up
1

What? "have to raise” off a swap wobble....bold call.

Whole setups different this time, could go either way from here, but I guess if you squint hard enough it probably looks like 2021 again.

Up
1

I agree. They will completely crash the economy if they lift too agressively. I'd say only very modest rises in the OCR are in store for us this year. Maybe 50 basis points this year, and another 25 basis points next year.

Up
4

The swap rates are doing it for them, they can raise 50bps & be seen to be doing something I guess…I’d be more worried about the stimulus that will follow if they do hike too hard.

Up
0